Skip to content
Compare AGF vs NEC

AGF vs NEC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare AGF vs NEC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

AGF AGF Home Team
NEC NEC Away Team
AGF
52.9
W W D D L D W D D W

Last 10 Matches

NEC
56.6
L D D D W D W W L D

Categories Won

5

AGF

2

Draw

8

NEC

Performance Radar

AGF
NEC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 5D, 1L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+4

+4

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Bech (2 goals)
B. Linssen (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
52.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.7

67.5

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 65.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

50%

1W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.14

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.06

2.04

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.34

Adjusted Power Rating
52.9

Attack: 41.0, Defense: 75.1, Form: 41.0

56.6

Attack: 66.6, Defense: 66.6, Form: 35.2

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2

16-30'

4
2

31-45'

3
2

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

3
2

76-90+'

4
AGF
NEC
AGF

Power Rating Breakdown

52.9

Overall

Attack 41.0
Defense 75.1
Form 41.0
Consistency 63.7
NEC

Power Rating Breakdown

56.6

Overall

Attack 66.6
Defense 66.6
Form 35.2
Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

50.7 vs 65.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 50%
AGF logo AGF
W
Brøndby (49%)
W
Sønderjyske (43%)
D
Midtjylland (52%)
D
Nordsjælland (60%)
L
Midtjylland (57%)
D
Nordsjælland (55%)
W
Viborg (55%)
D
Brøndby (44%)
NEC logo NEC
L
Groningen (66%)
D
Telstar (64%)
D
Twente (81%)
D
Feyenoord (67%)
W
Excelsior (60%)
D
Heerenveen (67%)
W
PSV (80%)
W
Volendam (49%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Brøndby A
2 - 0 W
49%
Sønderjyske H
2 - 1 W
43%
Midtjylland H
0 - 0 D
52%
Nordsjælland A
1 - 1 D
60%
Midtjylland A
1 - 2 L
57%
Nordsjælland H
1 - 1 D
55%
Viborg A
2 - 1 W
55%
Brøndby H
0 - 0 D
44%
Sønderjyske A
1 - 1 D
48%
Vejle A
2 - 1 W
44%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Groningen A
1 - 2 L
66%
Telstar H
1 - 1 D
64%
Twente A
1 - 1 D
81%
Feyenoord H
1 - 1 D
67%
Excelsior A
2 - 0 W
60%
Heerenveen H
2 - 2 D
67%
PSV A
3 - 2 W
80%
Volendam H
3 - 0 W
49%
Fortuna H
2 - 3 L
56%
Ajax A
1 - 1 D
67%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

NEC has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 67.5) compared to AGF (SoS: 52.4). This means NEC's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

NEC holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus AGF's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

AGF has the defensive edge, conceding 0.8 per match compared to NEC's 1.3.

AGF has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

AGF

AGF

VS
NEC

NEC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more