Compare AGF vs Standard

AGF vs Standard Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare AGF vs Standard: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

AGF Home Team

Standard Away Team

AGF

52.9

W W D D L D W D D W

Last 10 Matches

Standard

65.8

W W D L W L W D D W

Categories Won

AGF

Draw

Standard

Performance Radar

AGF

Standard

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 5D, 1L

50%

5W, 3D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match

1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

0.8

8 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

T. Bech (2 goals)

C. Nielsen (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 6

1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 14

Home Win Rate

25%

1W / 4 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate

50%

3W / 6 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

52.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.7

66.9

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 51.8

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 0 matches

100%

1W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.14

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.06

1.77

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.07

Adjusted Power Rating

52.9

Attack: 41.0, Defense: 75.1, Form: 41.0

65.8

Attack: 66.2, Defense: 81.8, Form: 58.5

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

AGF

Standard

Power Rating Breakdown

52.9

Overall

Attack 41.0

Defense 75.1

Form 41.0

Consistency 63.7

Power Rating Breakdown

65.8

Overall

Attack 66.2

Defense 81.8

Form 58.5

Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 59.5

Opponent Quality

50.7 vs 51.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 100%

AGF

Standard

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Brøndby A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 0 W

49%

Sønderjyske H

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

43%

Midtjylland H

Danish Superligaen

0 - 0 D

52%

Nordsjælland A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 1 D

60%

Midtjylland A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 2 L

57%

Nordsjælland H

Danish Superligaen

1 - 1 D

55%

Viborg A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

55%

Brøndby H

Danish Superligaen

0 - 0 D

44%

Sønderjyske A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 1 D

48%

Vejle A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

44%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

OHL H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

35%

Antwerp A

Belgian First Division A

5 - 0 W

45%

Genk A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

54%

Antwerp H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

40%

Charleroi A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

51%

Westerlo H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

57%

OHL A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

3 - 1 W

52%

Westerlo H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

57%

Antwerp A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 1 D

57%

ZW A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

70%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Standard has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 66.9) compared to AGF (SoS: 52.4). This means Standard's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Standard holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus AGF's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with AGF conceding 0.8 and Standard conceding 0.9 per match.

AGF has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Standard is a strong road team with a 67% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.3 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Standard has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 12.9 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

AGF

Standard

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair