Compare AZ vs Porto

AZ vs Porto Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare AZ vs Porto: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

AZ Home Team

Porto Away Team

56.5

D D D D W L W L W W

Last 10 Matches

Porto

60.9

L W W W L W D D W W

Categories Won

Draw

Porto

Performance Radar

Porto

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

60%

6W, 2D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match

1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

Clean Sheet

50%

5 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

S. Mijnans (5 goals)

William (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 9

1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 8

Home Win Rate

60%

3W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

54.7

League Difficulty: 79.4, Opponent Quality: 65.5

54.9

League Difficulty: 80.8, Opponent Quality: 64.4

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 5 matches

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.92

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.12

1.73

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.13

Adjusted Power Rating

56.5

Attack: 62.8, Defense: 66.3, Form: 41.9

60.9

Attack: 55.9, Defense: 69.9, Form: 62.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Porto

Power Rating Breakdown

56.5

Overall

Attack 62.8

Defense 66.3

Form 41.9

Consistency 56.8

Power Rating Breakdown

60.9

Overall

Attack 55.9

Defense 69.9

Form 62.9

Consistency 52.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

79.4 vs 80.8

Opponent Quality

65.5 vs 64.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Porto

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Feyenoord A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

72%

Twente H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 2 D

76%

Go Ahead A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 0 D

70%

Shakhtar D H

UEFA Conference League

2 - 2 D

70%

Heerenveen H

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 0 W

67%

Shakhtar D A

UEFA Conference League

0 - 3 L

75%

Fortuna H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 0 W

56%

Groningen A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 3 L

66%

Sparta Prague A

UEFA Conference League

4 - 0 W

67%

Heracles H

Dutch Eredivisie

4 - 0 W

36%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

AVS A

Portuguese Primeira Liga

1 - 3 L

64%

Alverca H

Portuguese Primeira Liga

1 - 0 W

59%

Estrela A

Portuguese Primeira Liga

2 - 1 W

54%

Tondela H

Portuguese Primeira Liga

2 - 0 W

52%

Nottm Forest A

UEFA Europa League

0 - 1 L

81%

Estoril A

Portuguese Primeira Liga

3 - 1 W

52%

Nottm Forest H

UEFA Europa League

1 - 1 D

76%

Famalicão H

Portuguese Primeira Liga

2 - 2 D

69%

Braga A

Portuguese Primeira Liga

2 - 1 W

69%

Stuttgart H

UEFA Europa League

2 - 0 W

68%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 54.7 vs 54.9), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with AZ averaging 1.8 and Porto averaging 1.6 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with AZ conceding 1.1 and Porto conceding 1.0 per match.

AZ has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Porto is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Porto

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair