Brann vs Napredak Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Brann vs Napredak: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Brann
Home Team
Napredak
Away Team
Compare...
Categories Won
Brann
Draw
Napredak
Performance Radar
Statistical Comparison
3W, 1D, 6L
1W, 1D, 8L
19 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
24 / 10 matches
+5
-16
1 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
1W / 4 matches
0W / 4 matches
2W / 6 matches
1W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 55.6
League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 55.5
0W / 1 matches
0W / 1 matches
Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.24
Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.02
Attack: 58.5, Defense: 49.2, Form: 27.7
Attack: 24.4, Defense: 18.3, Form: 9.1
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Brann
Napredak
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 42.3 vs 41.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.
Brann's attack is on another level, averaging 1.9 goals per match with K. Ingason leading the charge with 4 goals. Napredak manages just 0.8 per match.
Defensively, Brann is far superior, conceding just 1.4 goals per match with 1 clean sheets, while Napredak leaks 2.4 per match.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.
Brann emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (45.1 vs 25.8) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Brann
Napredak
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Popular Teams