Skip to content
Compare Brann vs Volos

Brann vs Volos Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Brann vs Volos: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Brann Brann Home Team
Volos Volos Away Team
Brann
45.1
W W D L L W L L L L

Last 10 Matches

Volos
34.6
L L L D W L D D L D

Categories Won

10

Brann

3

Draw

2

Volos

Performance Radar

Brann
Volos

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

10%

1W, 4D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+5

+5

-9

-9

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Ingason (4 goals)
J. Hurtado (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
42.3

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 55.6

53.4

League Difficulty: 56.0, Opponent Quality: 51.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.14

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.24

1.2

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating
45.1

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 49.2, Form: 27.7

34.6

Attack: 41.4, Defense: 31.0, Form: 10.3

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

1
5

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

1
2

61-75'

3
4

76-90+'

4
Brann
Volos
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

45.1

Overall

Attack 58.5
Defense 49.2
Form 27.7
Consistency 46.0
Volos

Power Rating Breakdown

34.6

Overall

Attack 41.4
Defense 31.0
Form 10.3
Consistency 75.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

57.0 vs 56.0

Opponent Quality

55.6 vs 51.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Brann logo Brann
W
Fredrikstad (39%)
W
Tromsø (68%)
D
Rosenborg (46%)
L
Viking (70%)
L
Sandefjord (50%)
W
HamKam (55%)
L
Tromsø (63%)
L
Kristiansund (48%)
Volos logo Volos
L
Levadiakos (44%)
L
Levadiakos (49%)
L
Aris (58%)
D
OFI (44%)
W
PAOK (54%)
L
Kifisia (54%)
D
OFI (44%)
D
AEK Athens (62%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fredrikstad H
3 - 1 W
39%
Tromsø A
5 - 0 W
68%
Rosenborg A
1 - 1 D
46%
Viking A
2 - 3 L
70%
Sandefjord H
0 - 1 L
50%
HamKam A
5 - 1 W
55%
Tromsø H
1 - 2 L
63%
Kristiansund A
2 - 3 L
48%
Bologna A
0 - 1 L
61%
Bologna H
0 - 1 L
56%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Levadiakos H
0 - 3 L
44%
Levadiakos A
2 - 5 L
49%
Aris A
2 - 3 L
58%
OFI H
1 - 1 D
44%
PAOK H
2 - 1 W
54%
Kifisia A
0 - 2 L
54%
OFI H
1 - 1 D
44%
AEK Athens H
2 - 2 D
62%
Panserraikos A
1 - 2 L
54%
Aris H
1 - 1 D
53%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Volos has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.4) compared to Brann (SoS: 42.3). This means Volos's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Brann holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus Volos's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Brann has the defensive edge, conceding 1.4 per match compared to Volos's 2.1.

Volos has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Brann has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.5 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Brann

Brann

VS
Volos

Volos

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more