Skip to content
Compare Brann vs WAC

Brann vs WAC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Brann vs WAC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Brann Brann Home Team
WAC WAC Away Team
Brann
45.1
W W D L L W L L L L

Last 10 Matches

WAC
41.5
W W W L D D L D L L

Categories Won

7

Brann

5

Draw

3

WAC

Performance Radar

Brann
WAC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+5

+5

-4

-4

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Ingason (4 goals)
D. Baumgartner (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 3
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
42.3

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 55.6

54.3

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.14

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.24

0.97

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.07

Adjusted Power Rating
45.1

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 49.2, Form: 27.7

41.5

Attack: 31.3, Defense: 59.1, Form: 31.3

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

1
5

31-45'

3
4

46-60'

1
2

61-75'

1
4

76-90+'

2
Brann
WAC
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

45.1

Overall

Attack 58.5
Defense 49.2
Form 27.7
Consistency 46.0
WAC

Power Rating Breakdown

41.5

Overall

Attack 31.3
Defense 59.1
Form 31.3
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

57.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

55.6 vs 53.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Brann logo Brann
W
Fredrikstad (39%)
W
Tromsø (68%)
D
Rosenborg (46%)
L
Viking (70%)
L
Sandefjord (50%)
W
HamKam (55%)
L
Tromsø (63%)
L
Kristiansund (48%)
WAC logo WAC
W
Ried (55%)
W
Altach (48%)
W
GAK (53%)
L
BW Linz (60%)
D
BW Linz (55%)
D
Ried (50%)
L
WSG Tirol (48%)
D
Altach (43%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fredrikstad H
3 - 1 W
39%
Tromsø A
5 - 0 W
68%
Rosenborg A
1 - 1 D
46%
Viking A
2 - 3 L
70%
Sandefjord H
0 - 1 L
50%
HamKam A
5 - 1 W
55%
Tromsø H
1 - 2 L
63%
Kristiansund A
2 - 3 L
48%
Bologna A
0 - 1 L
61%
Bologna H
0 - 1 L
56%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Ried A
1 - 0 W
55%
Altach A
4 - 1 W
48%
GAK H
1 - 0 W
53%
BW Linz A
0 - 3 L
60%
BW Linz H
0 - 0 D
55%
Ried H
0 - 0 D
50%
WSG Tirol A
1 - 3 L
48%
Altach H
1 - 1 D
43%
GAK A
0 - 2 L
58%
LASK A
1 - 3 L
69%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

WAC has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 54.3) compared to Brann (SoS: 42.3). This means WAC's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Brann holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus WAC's 0.9, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Brann conceding 1.4 and WAC conceding 1.3 per match.

WAC has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Brann

Brann

VS
WAC

WAC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more