Skip to content
Compare Brann vs Zlín

Brann vs Zlín Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Brann vs Zlín: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Brann Brann Home Team
Zlín Zlín Away Team
Brann
45.1
W W D L L W L L L L

Last 10 Matches

Zlín
37.7
L D W L W L L L L W

Categories Won

6

Brann

4

Draw

5

Zlín

Performance Radar

Brann
Zlín

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

2.5

25 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+5

+5

-9

-9

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Ingason (4 goals)
T. Poznar (6 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
42.3

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 55.6

55.7

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 54.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.14

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.24

1.65

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.05

Adjusted Power Rating
45.1

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 49.2, Form: 27.7

37.7

Attack: 56.4, Defense: 17.6, Form: 31.7

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

3
3

16-30'

1
5

31-45'

4
4

46-60'

1
2

61-75'

3
4

76-90+'

4
Brann
Zlín
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

45.1

Overall

Attack 58.5
Defense 49.2
Form 27.7
Consistency 46.0
Zlín

Power Rating Breakdown

37.7

Overall

Attack 56.4
Defense 17.6
Form 31.7
Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

57.0 vs 58.0

Opponent Quality

55.6 vs 54.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Brann logo Brann
W
Fredrikstad (39%)
W
Tromsø (68%)
D
Rosenborg (46%)
L
Viking (70%)
L
Sandefjord (50%)
W
HamKam (55%)
L
Tromsø (63%)
L
Kristiansund (48%)
Zlín logo Zlín
L
Teplice (49%)
D
Ml. Boleslav (66%)
W
Dukla (46%)
L
Pardubice (62%)
W
Teplice (49%)
L
Bohemians (58%)
L
Jablonec (44%)
L
Slavia Prague (69%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fredrikstad H
3 - 1 W
39%
Tromsø A
5 - 0 W
68%
Rosenborg A
1 - 1 D
46%
Viking A
2 - 3 L
70%
Sandefjord H
0 - 1 L
50%
HamKam A
5 - 1 W
55%
Tromsø H
1 - 2 L
63%
Kristiansund A
2 - 3 L
48%
Bologna A
0 - 1 L
61%
Bologna H
0 - 1 L
56%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Teplice H
2 - 4 L
49%
Ml. Boleslav A
1 - 1 D
66%
Dukla H
2 - 1 W
46%
Pardubice A
1 - 3 L
62%
Teplice H
3 - 2 W
49%
Bohemians A
1 - 2 L
58%
Jablonec H
0 - 3 L
44%
Slavia Prague H
1 - 3 L
69%
Ostrava A
2 - 6 L
39%
Plzeň H
3 - 0 W
59%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Zlín has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 55.7) compared to Brann (SoS: 42.3). This means Zlín's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Brann averaging 1.9 and Zlín averaging 1.6 goals per match.

Defensively, Brann is far superior, conceding just 1.4 goals per match with 1 clean sheets, while Zlín leaks 2.5 per match.

Zlín has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Brann has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.4 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Brann

Brann

VS
Zlín

Zlín

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more