Skip to content
Compare Como vs GC Zürich

Como vs GC Zürich Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Como vs GC Zürich: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Como Como Home Team
GC Zürich GC Zürich Away Team
Como
62.2
W D W L L L D W W W

Last 10 Matches

GC Zürich
27.9
W L L L W L L L L L

Categories Won

12

Como

2

Draw

1

GC Zürich

Performance Radar

Como
GC Zürich

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

20%

2W, 0D, 8L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

2.6

26 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+7

+7

-16

-16

Clean Sheet
50%

5 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Douvikas (4 goals)
D. Abels (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
63.4

League Difficulty: 85.5, Opponent Quality: 65.6

50.4

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.3

Elite Opponent Record
25%

1W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.05

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.25

1.0

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating
62.2

Attack: 68.0, Defense: 71.8, Form: 56.7

27.9

Attack: 33.5, Defense: 13.4, Form: 20.1

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

2
3

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

1
3

61-75'

3
4

76-90+'

1
Como
GC Zürich
Como

Power Rating Breakdown

62.2

Overall

Attack 68.0
Defense 71.8
Form 56.7
Consistency 45.7
GC Zürich

Power Rating Breakdown

27.9

Overall

Attack 33.5
Defense 13.4
Form 20.1
Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

85.5 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

65.6 vs 51.3

Elite Opponent Record

25% vs 0%
Como logo Como
W
Verona (55%)
D
Napoli (74%)
W
Genoa (67%)
L
Inter Milan (66%)
L
Sassuolo (69%)
L
Inter Milan (78%)
D
Udinese (79%)
W
Pisa (40%)
GC Zürich logo GC Zürich
W
Winterthur (42%)
L
Zürich (42%)
L
Servette (65%)
L
Luzern (56%)
W
Winterthur (42%)
L
Sion (62%)
L
Servette (66%)
L
Thun (49%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Verona A
1 - 0 W
55%
Napoli H
0 - 0 D
74%
Genoa A
2 - 0 W
67%
Inter Milan A
2 - 3 L
66%
Sassuolo A
1 - 2 L
69%
Inter Milan H
3 - 4 L
78%
Udinese A
0 - 0 D
79%
Pisa H
5 - 0 W
40%
Roma H
2 - 1 W
70%
Cagliari A
2 - 1 W
58%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Winterthur H
3 - 2 W
42%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
42%
Servette H
0 - 2 L
65%
Luzern H
1 - 2 L
56%
Winterthur A
2 - 0 W
42%
Sion H
0 - 4 L
62%
Servette A
0 - 5 L
66%
Thun A
1 - 5 L
49%
Lausanne H
2 - 3 L
38%
Basel A
0 - 1 L
51%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Como has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 63.4) compared to GC Zürich (SoS: 50.4). This means Como's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Como holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus GC Zürich's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Defensively, Como is far superior, conceding just 1.1 goals per match with 5 clean sheets, while GC Zürich leaks 2.6 per match.

Como has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

GC Zürich has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Based on our comprehensive analysis including opponent quality adjustment, Como is the clear and decisive favorite. Their superiority across attack (68.0), defense (71.8), and form (56.7) leaves little room for doubt. GC Zürich will need an exceptional performance to compete.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Como

Como

VS
GC Zürich

GC Zürich

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more