Skip to content
Compare Como vs Sion

Como vs Sion Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Como vs Sion: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Como Como Home Team
Sion Sion Away Team
Como
62.2
W D W L L L D W W W

Last 10 Matches

Sion
66.0
W W W W W D W D L D

Categories Won

6

Como

2

Draw

7

Sion

Performance Radar

Como
Sion

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

60%

6W, 3D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

0.5

5 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+7

+7

+14

+14

Clean Sheet
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Douvikas (4 goals)
W. Boteli (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 12
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
63.4

League Difficulty: 85.5, Opponent Quality: 65.6

48.3

League Difficulty: 48.0, Opponent Quality: 48.5

Elite Opponent Record
25%

1W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.05

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.25

1.92

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
62.2

Attack: 68.0, Defense: 71.8, Form: 56.7

66.0

Attack: 62.3, Defense: 81.9, Form: 59.0

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

4
3

31-45'

1
4

46-60'

2
3

61-75'

7
4

76-90+'

3
Como
Sion
Como

Power Rating Breakdown

62.2

Overall

Attack 68.0
Defense 71.8
Form 56.7
Consistency 45.7
Sion

Power Rating Breakdown

66.0

Overall

Attack 62.3
Defense 81.9
Form 59.0
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

85.5 vs 48.0

Opponent Quality

65.6 vs 48.5

Elite Opponent Record

25% vs 0%
Como logo Como
W
Verona (55%)
D
Napoli (74%)
W
Genoa (67%)
L
Inter Milan (66%)
L
Sassuolo (69%)
L
Inter Milan (78%)
D
Udinese (79%)
W
Pisa (40%)
Sion logo Sion
W
Thun (48%)
W
St.Gallen (64%)
W
Basel (55%)
W
Lausanne (38%)
W
GC Zürich (32%)
D
St.Gallen (55%)
W
Zürich (37%)
D
Winterthur (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Verona A
1 - 0 W
55%
Napoli H
0 - 0 D
74%
Genoa A
2 - 0 W
67%
Inter Milan A
2 - 3 L
66%
Sassuolo A
1 - 2 L
69%
Inter Milan H
3 - 4 L
78%
Udinese A
0 - 0 D
79%
Pisa H
5 - 0 W
40%
Roma H
2 - 1 W
70%
Cagliari A
2 - 1 W
58%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Thun H
2 - 0 W
48%
St.Gallen A
3 - 0 W
64%
Basel A
2 - 0 W
55%
Lausanne H
3 - 0 W
38%
GC Zürich A
4 - 0 W
32%
St.Gallen H
1 - 1 D
55%
Zürich A
2 - 1 W
37%
Winterthur H
1 - 1 D
38%
Lugano A
1 - 2 L
55%
Servette A
0 - 0 D
63%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Como has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 63.4) compared to Sion (SoS: 48.3). This means Como's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Como averaging 1.8 and Sion averaging 1.9 goals per match.

Sion has the defensive edge, conceding 0.5 per match compared to Como's 1.1.

Como has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Sion has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Sion is a strong road team with a 67% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Como

Como

VS
Sion

Sion

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more