Skip to content
Compare Cremonese vs Varaždin

Cremonese vs Varaždin Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Cremonese vs Varaždin: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Cremonese Cremonese Home Team
Varaždin Varaždin Away Team
Cremonese
36.5
W L L D L L W L L L

Last 10 Matches

Varaždin
42.1
D L L W W W D L W D

Categories Won

4

Cremonese

4

Draw

7

Varaždin

Performance Radar

Cremonese
Varaždin

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 1D, 7L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-8

-8

+2

+2

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
F. Bonazzoli (4 goals)
A. Latković (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
57.7

League Difficulty: 90.0, Opponent Quality: 62.0

34.6

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.12

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.22

1.06

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.24

Adjusted Power Rating
36.5

Attack: 32.3, Defense: 46.7, Form: 21.5

42.1

Attack: 36.7, Defense: 53.6, Form: 33.8

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

4
1

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

1
4

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

1
Cremonese
Varaždin
Cremonese

Power Rating Breakdown

36.5

Overall

Attack 32.3
Defense 46.7
Form 21.5
Consistency 57.7
Varaždin

Power Rating Breakdown

42.1

Overall

Attack 36.7
Defense 53.6
Form 33.8
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

90.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

62.0 vs 47.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Cremonese logo Cremonese
W
Pisa (40%)
L
Lazio (70%)
L
Napoli (79%)
D
Torino (69%)
L
Cagliari (58%)
L
Bologna (58%)
W
Parma (62%)
L
Fiorentina (66%)
Varaždin logo Varaždin
D
Lokomotiva (44%)
L
Hajduk (58%)
L
Dinamo Zagreb (76%)
W
Rijeka (44%)
W
Osijek (46%)
W
Slaven (35%)
D
Gorica (44%)
L
Istra (46%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Pisa H
3 - 0 W
40%
Lazio H
1 - 2 L
70%
Napoli A
0 - 4 L
79%
Torino H
0 - 0 D
69%
Cagliari A
0 - 1 L
58%
Bologna H
1 - 2 L
58%
Parma A
2 - 0 W
62%
Fiorentina H
1 - 4 L
66%
Lecce A
1 - 2 L
58%
AC Milan H
0 - 2 L
60%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Lokomotiva H
1 - 1 D
44%
Hajduk A
1 - 3 L
58%
Dinamo Zagreb A
1 - 2 L
76%
Rijeka H
1 - 0 W
44%
Osijek A
2 - 0 W
46%
Slaven H
2 - 1 W
35%
Gorica H
1 - 1 D
44%
Istra A
1 - 2 L
46%
Vukovar H
2 - 0 W
32%
Lokomotiva A
1 - 1 D
49%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Cremonese has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 57.7) compared to Varaždin (SoS: 34.6). This means Cremonese's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Varaždin holds the attacking edge with 1.3 goals per match versus Cremonese's 0.9, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Varaždin has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Cremonese's 1.7.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Varaždin has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.6 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Cremonese

Cremonese

VS
Varaždin

Varaždin

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more