Compare Dender vs Como

Dender vs Como Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Dender vs Como: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Dender Home Team

Como Away Team

Dender

33.6

L W L L L W L L D D

Last 10 Matches

Como

62.2

W D W L L L D W W W

Categories Won

Dender

Draw

Como

Performance Radar

Dender

Como

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match

1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-8

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

D. Hrnčár (2 goals)

T. Douvikas (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3

1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 10

Home Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

44.9

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 57.1

63.4

League Difficulty: 85.5, Opponent Quality: 65.6

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 1 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.01

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.01

2.05

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.25

Adjusted Power Rating

33.6

Attack: 31.6, Defense: 38.0, Form: 19.0

62.2

Attack: 68.0, Defense: 71.8, Form: 56.7

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Dender

Como

Power Rating Breakdown

33.6

Overall

Attack 31.6

Defense 38.0

Form 19.0

Consistency 59.2

Power Rating Breakdown

62.2

Overall

Attack 68.0

Defense 71.8

Form 56.7

Consistency 45.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.4 vs 85.5

Opponent Quality

57.1 vs 65.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 25%

Dender

Como

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

ZW A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

59%

La Louvière H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

38%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

51%

Cercle Brugge H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 4 L

46%

ZW H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

65%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

54%

Gent H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 3 L

58%

R. Union SG A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

80%

Charleroi H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 2 D

57%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

63%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Verona A

Italian Serie A

1 - 0 W

55%

Napoli H

Italian Serie A

0 - 0 D

74%

Genoa A

Italian Serie A

2 - 0 W

67%

Inter Milan A

Coppa Italia

2 - 3 L

66%

Sassuolo A

Italian Serie A

1 - 2 L

69%

Inter Milan H

Italian Serie A

3 - 4 L

78%

Udinese A

Italian Serie A

0 - 0 D

79%

Pisa H

Italian Serie A

5 - 0 W

40%

Roma H

Italian Serie A

2 - 1 W

70%

Cagliari A

Italian Serie A

2 - 1 W

58%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Como has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 63.4) compared to Dender (SoS: 44.9). This means Como's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Como holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus Dender's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Como has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Dender's 1.8.

Como has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Como emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (62.2 vs 33.6) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Dender

Como

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair