Compare Dender vs Malmö

Dender vs Malmö Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Dender vs Malmö: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Dender Home Team

Malmö Away Team

Dender

33.6

L W L L L W L L D D

Last 10 Matches

Malmö

39.9

L L W L W W D L L L

Categories Won

Dender

Draw

Malmö

Performance Radar

Dender

Malmö

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match

1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-8

-2

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

D. Hrnčár (2 goals)

S. Hakšabanović (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 7

Home Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

44.9

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 57.1

45.2

League Difficulty: 60.5, Opponent Quality: 60.1

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 1 matches

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.01

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.01

1.44

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.04

Adjusted Power Rating

33.6

Attack: 31.6, Defense: 38.0, Form: 19.0

39.9

Attack: 44.4, Defense: 44.4, Form: 28.6

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Dender

Malmö

Power Rating Breakdown

33.6

Overall

Attack 31.6

Defense 38.0

Form 19.0

Consistency 59.2

Power Rating Breakdown

39.9

Overall

Attack 44.4

Defense 44.4

Form 28.6

Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.4 vs 60.5

Opponent Quality

57.1 vs 60.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Dender

Malmö

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

ZW A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

59%

La Louvière H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

38%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

51%

Cercle Brugge H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 4 L

46%

ZW H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

65%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

54%

Gent H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 3 L

58%

R. Union SG A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

80%

Charleroi H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 2 D

57%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

63%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Häcken A

Swedish Allsvenskan

2 - 3 L

58%

Mjällby H

Swedish Allsvenskan

2 - 3 L

54%

AIK A

Swedish Allsvenskan

1 - 0 W

49%

Sirius H

Swedish Allsvenskan

2 - 3 L

65%

Djurgården A

Swedish Allsvenskan

1 - 0 W

59%

GAIS H

Swedish Allsvenskan

3 - 1 W

47%

Örgryte A

Swedish Allsvenskan

1 - 1 D

41%

Genk A

UEFA Europa League

1 - 2 L

70%

Red Star H

UEFA Europa League

0 - 1 L

81%

Porto A

UEFA Europa League

1 - 2 L

77%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 44.9 vs 45.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Malmö holds the attacking edge with 1.4 goals per match versus Dender's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Dender conceding 1.8 and Malmö conceding 1.6 per match.

Malmö has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Malmö has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.3 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Dender

Malmö

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair