Skip to content
Compare Feyenoord vs Standard

Feyenoord vs Standard Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Feyenoord vs Standard: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Feyenoord Feyenoord Home Team
Standard Standard Away Team
Feyenoord
53.2
D W W D D D W D L W

Last 10 Matches

Standard
65.8
W W D L W L W D D W

Categories Won

3

Feyenoord

1

Draw

11

Standard

Performance Radar

Feyenoord
Standard

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 5D, 1L

50%

5W, 3D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+3

+3

+8

+8

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Ueda (7 goals)
C. Nielsen (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 14
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.9

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.7

66.9

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 51.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

100%

1W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.74

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.24

1.77

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.07

Adjusted Power Rating
53.2

Attack: 52.0, Defense: 62.3, Form: 41.6

65.8

Attack: 66.2, Defense: 81.8, Form: 58.5

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

4

16-30'

2

31-45'

3
4

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

4
3

76-90+'

8
Feyenoord
Standard
Feyenoord

Power Rating Breakdown

53.2

Overall

Attack 52.0
Defense 62.3
Form 41.6
Consistency 63.7
Standard

Power Rating Breakdown

65.8

Overall

Attack 66.2
Defense 81.8
Form 58.5
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 59.5

Opponent Quality

62.7 vs 51.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 100%
Feyenoord logo Feyenoord
D
AZ (67%)
W
Fortuna (61%)
W
Groningen (61%)
D
NEC (69%)
D
Volendam (54%)
D
Ajax (62%)
W
Excelsior (54%)
D
NAC (54%)
Standard logo Standard
W
OHL (35%)
W
Antwerp (45%)
D
Genk (54%)
L
Antwerp (40%)
W
Charleroi (51%)
L
Westerlo (57%)
W
OHL (52%)
D
Westerlo (57%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
AZ H
1 - 1 D
67%
Fortuna A
2 - 1 W
61%
Groningen H
3 - 1 W
61%
NEC A
1 - 1 D
69%
Volendam A
0 - 0 D
54%
Ajax H
1 - 1 D
62%
Excelsior H
2 - 1 W
54%
NAC A
3 - 3 D
54%
Twente A
0 - 2 L
81%
Telstar H
2 - 1 W
64%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
OHL H
2 - 1 W
35%
Antwerp A
5 - 0 W
45%
Genk A
1 - 1 D
54%
Antwerp H
1 - 2 L
40%
Charleroi A
2 - 1 W
51%
Westerlo H
1 - 2 L
57%
OHL A
3 - 1 W
52%
Westerlo H
0 - 0 D
57%
Antwerp A
1 - 1 D
57%
ZW A
1 - 0 W
70%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Standard has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 66.9) compared to Feyenoord (SoS: 53.9). This means Standard's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Feyenoord averaging 1.5 and Standard averaging 1.7 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Feyenoord conceding 1.2 and Standard conceding 0.9 per match.

Standard is a strong road team with a 67% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Standard has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 12.6 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Feyenoord

Feyenoord

VS
Standard

Standard

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more