Skip to content
Compare Gaziantep vs Cercle Brugge

Gaziantep vs Cercle Brugge Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Gaziantep vs Cercle Brugge: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Gaziantep Gaziantep Home Team
Cercle Brugge Cercle Brugge Away Team
Gaziantep
38.7
L L L W L D L W D D

Last 10 Matches

Cercle Brugge
44.6
L L W W W D W L L D

Categories Won

3

Gaziantep

3

Draw

9

Cercle Brugge

Performance Radar

Gaziantep
Cercle Brugge

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-4

-4

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Bayo (5 goals)
O. Diakité (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.4

League Difficulty: 72.0, Opponent Quality: 58.9

42.4

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 49.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.09

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.11

2.0

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.1

Adjusted Power Rating
38.7

Attack: 39.8, Defense: 46.4, Form: 19.9

44.6

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 37.0, Form: 37.0

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

3
2

16-30'

4

31-45'

2
5

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

4
3

76-90+'

2
Gaziantep
Cercle Brugge
Gaziantep

Power Rating Breakdown

38.7

Overall

Attack 39.8
Defense 46.4
Form 19.9
Consistency 61.3
Cercle Brugge

Power Rating Breakdown

44.6

Overall

Attack 58.5
Defense 37.0
Form 37.0
Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

72.0 vs 62.4

Opponent Quality

58.9 vs 49.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Gaziantep logo Gaziantep
L
Göztepe (64%)
L
Beşiktaş (60%)
L
Eyüp (58%)
W
Kayseri (44%)
L
Rize (64%)
D
Alanyaspor (56%)
L
Fenerbahçe (73%)
W
Antalyaspor (48%)
Cercle Brugge logo Cercle Brugge
L
La Louvière (42%)
L
ZW (54%)
W
Dender (35%)
W
Dender (40%)
W
La Louvière (49%)
D
ZW (70%)
W
Anderlecht (52%)
L
La Louvière (49%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Göztepe A
1 - 2 L
64%
Beşiktaş H
0 - 2 L
60%
Eyüp A
0 - 3 L
58%
Kayseri H
3 - 0 W
44%
Rize A
1 - 2 L
64%
Alanyaspor H
1 - 1 D
56%
Fenerbahçe A
1 - 4 L
73%
Antalyaspor A
4 - 1 W
48%
Fatih H
1 - 1 D
55%
Samsunspor A
0 - 0 D
67%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
La Louvière A
1 - 4 L
42%
ZW H
2 - 3 L
54%
Dender H
2 - 1 W
35%
Dender A
4 - 1 W
40%
La Louvière H
3 - 0 W
49%
ZW A
2 - 2 D
70%
Anderlecht A
3 - 2 W
52%
La Louvière H
1 - 3 L
49%
Sint-Truiden A
1 - 2 L
60%
Dender H
0 - 0 D
46%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 49.4 vs 42.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Cercle Brugge holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus Gaziantep's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Gaziantep conceding 1.6 and Cercle Brugge conceding 1.8 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Cercle Brugge has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.9 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Gaziantep

Gaziantep

VS
Cercle Brugge

Cercle Brugge

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more