Compare GAK vs Thun

GAK vs Thun Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare GAK vs Thun: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

GAK Home Team

Thun Away Team

GAK

52.1

D W L L D L W W W L

Last 10 Matches

Thun

41.3

L L L W L L W W D W

Categories Won

GAK

Draw

Thun

Performance Radar

GAK

Thun

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match

1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

R. Harakaté (4 goals)

E. Rastoder (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 9

Home Win Rate

60%

3W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

51.3

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 48.8

37.3

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 50.6

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 0 matches

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.66

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.04

1.36

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.24

Adjusted Power Rating

52.1

Attack: 57.4, Defense: 64.2, Form: 40.5

41.3

Attack: 46.6, Defense: 43.6, Form: 34.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

GAK

Thun

Power Rating Breakdown

52.1

Overall

Attack 57.4

Defense 64.2

Form 40.5

Consistency 44.8

Power Rating Breakdown

41.3

Overall

Attack 46.6

Defense 43.6

Form 34.9

Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

48.8 vs 50.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

GAK

Thun

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Altach H

Austrian Bundesliga

2 - 2 D

43%

WSG Tirol H

Austrian Bundesliga

4 - 0 W

44%

WAC A

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 1 L

51%

Ried A

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 2 L

55%

Ried H

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 1 D

50%

Altach A

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 1 L

48%

BW Linz H

Austrian Bundesliga

2 - 1 W

55%

WSG Tirol A

Austrian Bundesliga

5 - 1 W

48%

WAC H

Austrian Bundesliga

2 - 0 W

46%

WSG Tirol A

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 2 L

48%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Sion A

Swiss Super League

0 - 2 L

70%

Basel A

Swiss Super League

1 - 3 L

55%

Lugano H

Swiss Super League

0 - 1 L

54%

Basel H

Swiss Super League

3 - 1 W

50%

Lugano A

Brack Super League

0 - 1 L

55%

Zürich A

Brack Super League

1 - 2 L

37%

GC Zürich H

Brack Super League

5 - 1 W

27%

Young Boys A

Brack Super League

2 - 1 W

56%

St.Gallen H

Brack Super League

2 - 2 D

55%

Luzern H

Brack Super League

2 - 1 W

47%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

GAK has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 51.3) compared to Thun (SoS: 37.3). This means GAK's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with GAK averaging 1.7 and Thun averaging 1.6 goals per match.

GAK has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Thun's 1.5.

GAK has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

GAK has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.8 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

GAK

Thun

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair