Skip to content
Compare Heidenheim vs Istra

Heidenheim vs Istra Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Heidenheim vs Istra: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Heidenheim Heidenheim Home Team
Istra Istra Away Team
Heidenheim
48.6
W D W L W D D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Istra
35.8
W W L L L L L W W L

Categories Won

9

Heidenheim

2

Draw

4

Istra

Performance Radar

Heidenheim
Istra

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

40%

4W, 0D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
0

0

-3

-3

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
B. Zivzivadze (5 goals)
S. Prevljak (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
59.3

League Difficulty: 91.0, Opponent Quality: 65.4

34.5

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.61

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.71

0.93

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.07

Adjusted Power Rating
48.6

Attack: 69.2, Defense: 40.1, Form: 32.8

35.8

Attack: 28.2, Defense: 47.9, Form: 33.8

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

3
3

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

4

61-75'

1
5

76-90+'

3
Heidenheim
Istra
Heidenheim

Power Rating Breakdown

48.6

Overall

Attack 69.2
Defense 40.1
Form 32.8
Consistency 53.2
Istra

Power Rating Breakdown

35.8

Overall

Attack 28.2
Defense 47.9
Form 33.8
Consistency 35.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

91.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

65.4 vs 47.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Heidenheim logo Heidenheim
W
Köln (62%)
D
Bayern Munich (86%)
W
St. Pauli (50%)
L
Freiburg (72%)
W
Union Berlin (52%)
D
M'gladbach (68%)
D
Leverkusen (65%)
L
Frankfurt (67%)
Istra logo Istra
W
Osijek (46%)
W
Slaven (35%)
L
Gorica (50%)
L
Dinamo Zagreb (71%)
L
Vukovar (32%)
L
Lokomotiva (49%)
L
Hajduk (53%)
W
Varaždin (48%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Köln A
3 - 1 W
62%
Bayern Munich A
3 - 3 D
86%
St. Pauli H
2 - 0 W
50%
Freiburg A
1 - 2 L
72%
Union Berlin H
3 - 1 W
52%
M'gladbach A
2 - 2 D
68%
Leverkusen H
3 - 3 D
65%
Frankfurt A
0 - 1 L
67%
Hoffenheim H
2 - 4 L
65%
Bremen A
0 - 2 L
67%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Osijek A
1 - 0 W
46%
Slaven H
3 - 1 W
35%
Gorica A
0 - 1 L
50%
Dinamo Zagreb H
0 - 2 L
71%
Vukovar H
1 - 2 L
32%
Lokomotiva A
0 - 2 L
49%
Hajduk H
1 - 3 L
53%
Varaždin H
2 - 1 W
48%
Rijeka A
2 - 0 W
48%
Osijek H
0 - 1 L
40%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Heidenheim has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 59.3) compared to Istra (SoS: 34.5). This means Heidenheim's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Heidenheim holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus Istra's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Istra has the defensive edge, conceding 1.3 per match compared to Heidenheim's 1.9.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Heidenheim has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 12.8 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Heidenheim

Heidenheim

VS
Istra

Istra

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more