Skip to content
Compare Heidenheim vs Jagiellonia

Heidenheim vs Jagiellonia Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Heidenheim vs Jagiellonia: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Heidenheim Heidenheim Home Team
Jagiellonia Jagiellonia Away Team
Heidenheim
48.6
W D W L W D D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Jagiellonia
45.0
W L W D D L W L L D

Categories Won

7

Heidenheim

4

Draw

4

Jagiellonia

Performance Radar

Heidenheim
Jagiellonia

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
0

0

-1

-1

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
B. Zivzivadze (5 goals)
A. Pululu (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

29%

2W / 7 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
59.3

League Difficulty: 91.0, Opponent Quality: 65.4

54.4

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 52.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.61

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.71

1.23

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.17

Adjusted Power Rating
48.6

Attack: 69.2, Defense: 40.1, Form: 32.8

45.0

Attack: 48.7, Defense: 52.2, Form: 31.3

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

4
3

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

3
2

46-60'

4

61-75'

1
5

76-90+'

3
Heidenheim
Jagiellonia
Heidenheim

Power Rating Breakdown

48.6

Overall

Attack 69.2
Defense 40.1
Form 32.8
Consistency 53.2
Jagiellonia

Power Rating Breakdown

45.0

Overall

Attack 48.7
Defense 52.2
Form 31.3
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

91.0 vs 57.0

Opponent Quality

65.4 vs 52.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Heidenheim logo Heidenheim
W
Köln (62%)
D
Bayern Munich (86%)
W
St. Pauli (50%)
L
Freiburg (72%)
W
Union Berlin (52%)
D
M'gladbach (68%)
D
Leverkusen (65%)
L
Frankfurt (67%)
Jagiellonia logo Jagiellonia
W
Pogoń (49%)
L
Górnik (53%)
W
Arka (49%)
D
Kielce (48%)
D
Lech (64%)
L
Wisła Płock (42%)
W
GKS Katowice (59%)
L
Piast (53%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Köln A
3 - 1 W
62%
Bayern Munich A
3 - 3 D
86%
St. Pauli H
2 - 0 W
50%
Freiburg A
1 - 2 L
72%
Union Berlin H
3 - 1 W
52%
M'gladbach A
2 - 2 D
68%
Leverkusen H
3 - 3 D
65%
Frankfurt A
0 - 1 L
67%
Hoffenheim H
2 - 4 L
65%
Bremen A
0 - 2 L
67%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Pogoń H
3 - 2 W
49%
Górnik H
1 - 2 L
53%
Arka A
3 - 0 W
49%
Kielce A
1 - 1 D
48%
Lech H
0 - 0 D
64%
Wisła Płock H
1 - 2 L
42%
GKS Katowice H
2 - 1 W
59%
Piast H
1 - 2 L
53%
Lechia A
0 - 3 L
51%
Legia H
2 - 2 D
59%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 59.3 vs 54.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Heidenheim holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus Jagiellonia's 1.4, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Jagiellonia has the defensive edge, conceding 1.5 per match compared to Heidenheim's 1.9.

Jagiellonia has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Heidenheim

Heidenheim

VS
Jagiellonia

Jagiellonia

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more