Skip to content
Compare KuPS vs Brest

KuPS vs Brest Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Brest: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS KuPS Home Team
Brest Brest Away Team
KuPS
40.4
D L D W D W W L L D

Last 10 Matches

Brest
40.9
L L D D L L L W W W

Categories Won

4

KuPS

4

Draw

7

Brest

Performance Radar

KuPS
Brest

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 4D, 3L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-1

-1

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Moreno (4 goals)
L. Ajorque (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
40.8

League Difficulty: 54.9, Opponent Quality: 53.9

58.0

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 67.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.05

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.05

1.49

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.29

Adjusted Power Rating
40.4

Attack: 33.3, Defense: 54.5, Form: 27.2

40.9

Attack: 43.2, Defense: 43.2, Form: 32.4

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

3

16-30'

2
1

31-45'

1
4

46-60'

2

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

1
KuPS
Brest
KuPS

Power Rating Breakdown

40.4

Overall

Attack 33.3
Defense 54.5
Form 27.2
Consistency 57.7
Brest

Power Rating Breakdown

40.9

Overall

Attack 43.2
Defense 43.2
Form 32.4
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

54.9 vs 86.0

Opponent Quality

53.9 vs 67.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
KuPS logo KuPS
D
SJK (43%)
L
Oulu (53%)
D
HJK (50%)
W
Oulu (50%)
D
Jaro (44%)
W
Gnistan (39%)
W
Ilves (43%)
L
Lech (77%)
Brest logo Brest
L
Paris SG (84%)
L
Paris FC (77%)
D
Lens (71%)
D
Nantes (56%)
L
Rennes (75%)
L
Auxerre (71%)
L
Monaco (77%)
W
Le Havre (53%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
SJK H
0 - 0 D
43%
Oulu A
0 - 2 L
53%
HJK H
1 - 1 D
50%
Oulu H
3 - 2 W
50%
Jaro A
1 - 1 D
44%
Gnistan H
1 - 0 W
39%
Ilves A
3 - 1 W
43%
Lech A
0 - 1 L
77%
Lech H
0 - 2 L
72%
Crystal Palace A
2 - 2 D
68%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Paris SG A
0 - 1 L
84%
Paris FC A
0 - 4 L
77%
Lens H
3 - 3 D
71%
Nantes A
1 - 1 D
56%
Rennes H
3 - 4 L
75%
Auxerre A
0 - 3 L
71%
Monaco A
0 - 2 L
77%
Le Havre H
2 - 0 W
53%
Metz A
1 - 0 W
48%
Marseille H
2 - 0 W
61%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Brest has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 58.0) compared to KuPS (SoS: 40.8). This means Brest's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with KuPS averaging 1.1 and Brest averaging 1.2 goals per match.

KuPS has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Brest's 1.8.

Brest has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 6 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

KuPS

VS
Brest

Brest

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more