KuPS vs Cremonese Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare KuPS vs Cremonese: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
KuPS
Home Team
Cremonese
Away Team
Compare...
Categories Won
KuPS
Draw
Cremonese
Performance Radar
Statistical Comparison
3W, 4D, 3L
2W, 1D, 7L
11 / 10 matches
9 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
17 / 10 matches
-1
-8
2 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
2W / 5 matches
1W / 6 matches
1W / 5 matches
1W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 54.9, Opponent Quality: 53.9
League Difficulty: 90.0, Opponent Quality: 62.0
0W / 2 matches
0W / 2 matches
Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.05
Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.22
Attack: 33.3, Defense: 54.5, Form: 27.2
Attack: 32.3, Defense: 46.7, Form: 21.5
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
KuPS
Cremonese
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.
Cremonese has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 57.7) compared to KuPS (SoS: 40.8). This means Cremonese's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.
Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with KuPS averaging 1.1 and Cremonese averaging 0.9 goals per match.
KuPS has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Cremonese's 1.7.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.4 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
KuPS
Cremonese
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Popular Teams