Compare KuPS vs Heidenheim

KuPS vs Heidenheim Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Heidenheim: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS Home Team

Heidenheim Away Team

KuPS

40.4

D L D W D W W L L D

Last 10 Matches

Heidenheim

48.6

W D W L W D D L L L

Categories Won

KuPS

Draw

Heidenheim

Performance Radar

KuPS

Heidenheim

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

30%

3W, 4D, 3L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-1

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

30%

3 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

J. Moreno (4 goals)

B. Zivzivadze (5 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7

1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 11

Home Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

40.8

League Difficulty: 54.9, Opponent Quality: 53.9

59.3

League Difficulty: 91.0, Opponent Quality: 65.4

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.05

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.05

2.61

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.71

Adjusted Power Rating

40.4

Attack: 33.3, Defense: 54.5, Form: 27.2

48.6

Attack: 69.2, Defense: 40.1, Form: 32.8

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

KuPS

Heidenheim

Power Rating Breakdown

40.4

Overall

Attack 33.3

Defense 54.5

Form 27.2

Consistency 57.7

Power Rating Breakdown

48.6

Overall

Attack 69.2

Defense 40.1

Form 32.8

Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

54.9 vs 91.0

Opponent Quality

53.9 vs 65.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

KuPS

Heidenheim

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

SJK H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

0 - 0 D

43%

Oulu A

Finnish Veikkausliiga

0 - 2 L

53%

HJK H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

1 - 1 D

50%

Oulu H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

3 - 2 W

50%

Jaro A

Finnish Veikkausliiga

1 - 1 D

44%

Gnistan H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

1 - 0 W

39%

Ilves A

Finnish Veikkausliiga

3 - 1 W

43%

Lech A

UEFA Conference League

0 - 1 L

77%

Lech H

UEFA Conference League

0 - 2 L

72%

Crystal Palace A

UEFA Conference League

2 - 2 D

68%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Köln A

German Bundesliga

3 - 1 W

62%

Bayern Munich A

German Bundesliga

3 - 3 D

86%

St. Pauli H

German Bundesliga

2 - 0 W

50%

Freiburg A

German Bundesliga

1 - 2 L

72%

Union Berlin H

German Bundesliga

3 - 1 W

52%

M'gladbach A

German Bundesliga

2 - 2 D

68%

Leverkusen H

German Bundesliga

3 - 3 D

65%

Frankfurt A

German Bundesliga

0 - 1 L

67%

Hoffenheim H

German Bundesliga

2 - 4 L

65%

Bremen A

German Bundesliga

0 - 2 L

67%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Heidenheim has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 59.3) compared to KuPS (SoS: 40.8). This means Heidenheim's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Heidenheim holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus KuPS's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

KuPS has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Heidenheim's 1.9.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Heidenheim has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 8.2 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

Heidenheim

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair