Compare KuPS vs Liberec

KuPS vs Liberec Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Liberec: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS Home Team

Liberec Away Team

KuPS

40.4

D L D W D W W L L D

Last 10 Matches

Liberec

35.3

L L W D L W D D L L

Categories Won

KuPS

Draw

Liberec

Performance Radar

KuPS

Liberec

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

30%

3W, 4D, 3L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

0.7

7 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-1

-5

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

30%

3 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

J. Moreno (4 goals)

R. Krollis (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7

1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 4

Home Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

40.8

League Difficulty: 54.9, Opponent Quality: 53.9

43.4

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 57.6

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.05

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.05

0.75

Actual: 0.7 | Diff: -0.05

Adjusted Power Rating

40.4

Attack: 33.3, Defense: 54.5, Form: 27.2

35.3

Attack: 21.8, Defense: 56.0, Form: 18.7

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

KuPS

Liberec

Power Rating Breakdown

40.4

Overall

Attack 33.3

Defense 54.5

Form 27.2

Consistency 57.7

Power Rating Breakdown

35.3

Overall

Attack 21.8

Defense 56.0

Form 18.7

Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

54.9 vs 58.0

Opponent Quality

53.9 vs 57.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

KuPS

Liberec

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

SJK H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

0 - 0 D

43%

Oulu A

Finnish Veikkausliiga

0 - 2 L

53%

HJK H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

1 - 1 D

50%

Oulu H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

3 - 2 W

50%

Jaro A

Finnish Veikkausliiga

1 - 1 D

44%

Gnistan H

Finnish Veikkausliiga

1 - 0 W

39%

Ilves A

Finnish Veikkausliiga

3 - 1 W

43%

Lech A

UEFA Conference League

0 - 1 L

77%

Lech H

UEFA Conference League

0 - 2 L

72%

Crystal Palace A

UEFA Conference League

2 - 2 D

68%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Plzeň A

Czech First League

0 - 2 L

64%

Slavia Prague H

Czech First League

1 - 2 L

69%

Jablonec A

Czech First League

2 - 1 W

49%

Ml. Boleslav H

Czech First League

0 - 0 D

61%

Karviná A

Czech First League

1 - 3 L

48%

Slovácko H

Czech First League

2 - 1 W

45%

Teplice H

Czech First League

1 - 1 D

49%

Bohemians A

Czech First League

0 - 0 D

58%

Hradec Kr. H

Czech First League

0 - 1 L

59%

Slavia Prague A

Czech First League

0 - 1 L

74%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 40.8 vs 43.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

KuPS holds the attacking edge with 1.1 goals per match versus Liberec's 0.7, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with KuPS conceding 1.2 and Liberec conceding 1.2 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.1 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

KuPS has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.1 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

Liberec

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair