Compare Larissa vs Dender

Larissa vs Dender Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Larissa vs Dender: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Larissa Home Team

Dender Away Team

Larissa

37.4

D D D L D L L L D D

Last 10 Matches

Dender

33.6

L W L L L W L L D D

Categories Won

Larissa

Draw

Dender

Performance Radar

Larissa

Dender

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

0W, 6D, 4L

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match

0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-5

-8

Clean Sheet

10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

30%

3 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

80%

8 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

Ľ. Tupta (3 goals)

D. Hrnčár (2 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 8

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3

Home Win Rate

0W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

0W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

55.2

League Difficulty: 56.0, Opponent Quality: 54.6

44.9

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 57.1

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 0 matches

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

0.95

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.05

1.01

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.01

Adjusted Power Rating

37.4

Attack: 31.6, Defense: 56.1, Form: 0.0

33.6

Attack: 31.6, Defense: 38.0, Form: 19.0

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Larissa

Dender

Power Rating Breakdown

37.4

Overall

Attack 31.6

Defense 56.1

Form 0.0

Consistency 92.8

Power Rating Breakdown

33.6

Overall

Attack 31.6

Defense 38.0

Form 19.0

Consistency 59.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

56.0 vs 62.4

Opponent Quality

54.6 vs 57.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Larissa

Dender

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Panaitolikos A

Greek Super League

1 - 1 D

53%

Asteras H

Greek Super League

1 - 1 D

56%

Panserraikos A

Greek Super League

1 - 1 D

54%

Panserraikos H

Greek Super League

0 - 1 L

49%

Kifisia H

Greek Super League

1 - 1 D

49%

Atromitos A

Greek Super League

2 - 3 L

59%

Panaitolikos H

Greek Super League

1 - 2 L

48%

Asteras A

Greek Super League

1 - 3 L

61%

Olympiakos A

Greek Super League

0 - 0 D

61%

Asteras H

Greek Super League

1 - 1 D

56%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

ZW A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

59%

La Louvière H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

38%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

51%

Cercle Brugge H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 4 L

46%

ZW H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

65%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

54%

Gent H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 3 L

58%

R. Union SG A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

80%

Charleroi H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 2 D

57%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

63%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Larissa has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 55.2) compared to Dender (SoS: 44.9). This means Larissa's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Larissa averaging 0.9 and Dender averaging 1.0 goals per match.

Larissa has the defensive edge, conceding 1.4 per match compared to Dender's 1.8.

Larissa has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Larissa

Dender

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair