Larissa vs Malmö Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Larissa vs Malmö: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Larissa
Home Team
Malmö
Away Team
Compare...
Categories Won
Larissa
Draw
Malmö
Performance Radar
Statistical Comparison
0W, 6D, 4L
3W, 1D, 6L
9 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
16 / 10 matches
-5
-2
1 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
0W / 5 matches
1W / 4 matches
0W / 5 matches
2W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 56.0, Opponent Quality: 54.6
League Difficulty: 60.5, Opponent Quality: 60.1
0W / 0 matches
0W / 3 matches
Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.05
Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.04
Attack: 31.6, Defense: 56.1, Form: 0.0
Attack: 44.4, Defense: 44.4, Form: 28.6
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Larissa
Malmö
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 55.2 vs 45.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.
Malmö holds the attacking edge with 1.4 goals per match versus Larissa's 0.9, though the gap is not insurmountable.
Both defenses are comparable, with Larissa conceding 1.4 and Malmö conceding 1.6 per match.
Larissa has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Malmö has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.
This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Larissa
Malmö
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Popular Teams