Larissa vs Napredak Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Larissa vs Napredak: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Larissa
Home Team
Napredak
Away Team
Compare...
Categories Won
Larissa
Draw
Napredak
Performance Radar
Statistical Comparison
0W, 6D, 4L
1W, 1D, 8L
9 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
24 / 10 matches
-5
-16
1 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
0W / 5 matches
0W / 4 matches
0W / 5 matches
1W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 56.0, Opponent Quality: 54.6
League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 55.5
0W / 0 matches
0W / 1 matches
Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.05
Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.02
Attack: 31.6, Defense: 56.1, Form: 0.0
Attack: 24.4, Defense: 18.3, Form: 9.1
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Larissa
Napredak
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.
Larissa has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 55.2) compared to Napredak (SoS: 41.4). This means Larissa's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.
Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Larissa averaging 0.9 and Napredak averaging 0.8 goals per match.
Defensively, Larissa is far superior, conceding just 1.4 goals per match with 1 clean sheets, while Napredak leaks 2.4 per match.
Larissa has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.
Larissa has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.6 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Larissa
Napredak
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Popular Teams