Skip to content
Compare Larissa vs Parma

Larissa vs Parma Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Larissa vs Parma: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Larissa Larissa Home Team
Parma Parma Away Team
Larissa
37.4
D D D L D L L L D D

Last 10 Matches

Parma
40.5
L L W W D D L L D D

Categories Won

5

Larissa

2

Draw

8

Parma

Performance Radar

Larissa
Parma

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
0%

0W, 6D, 4L

20%

2W, 4D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Ľ. Tupta (3 goals)
N. Elphege (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.2

League Difficulty: 56.0, Opponent Quality: 54.6

63.0

League Difficulty: 90.0, Opponent Quality: 67.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

14%

1W / 7 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.95

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.05

1.0

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.2

Adjusted Power Rating
37.4

Attack: 31.6, Defense: 56.1, Form: 0.0

40.5

Attack: 30.1, Defense: 60.3, Form: 22.6

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

4

46-60'

2

61-75'

4

76-90+'

3
Larissa
Parma
Larissa

Power Rating Breakdown

37.4

Overall

Attack 31.6
Defense 56.1
Form 0.0
Consistency 92.8
Parma

Power Rating Breakdown

40.5

Overall

Attack 30.1
Defense 60.3
Form 22.6
Consistency 64.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

56.0 vs 90.0

Opponent Quality

54.6 vs 67.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 14%
Larissa logo Larissa
D
Panaitolikos (53%)
D
Asteras (56%)
D
Panserraikos (54%)
L
Panserraikos (49%)
D
Kifisia (49%)
L
Atromitos (59%)
L
Panaitolikos (48%)
L
Asteras (61%)
Parma logo Parma
L
Roma (70%)
L
Inter Milan (84%)
W
Pisa (40%)
W
Udinese (79%)
D
Napoli (74%)
D
Lazio (76%)
L
Cremonese (51%)
L
Torino (74%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Panaitolikos A
1 - 1 D
53%
Asteras H
1 - 1 D
56%
Panserraikos A
1 - 1 D
54%
Panserraikos H
0 - 1 L
49%
Kifisia H
1 - 1 D
49%
Atromitos A
2 - 3 L
59%
Panaitolikos H
1 - 2 L
48%
Asteras A
1 - 3 L
61%
Olympiakos A
0 - 0 D
61%
Asteras H
1 - 1 D
56%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Roma H
2 - 3 L
70%
Inter Milan A
0 - 2 L
84%
Pisa H
1 - 0 W
40%
Udinese A
1 - 0 W
79%
Napoli H
1 - 1 D
74%
Lazio A
1 - 1 D
76%
Cremonese H
0 - 2 L
51%
Torino A
1 - 4 L
74%
Fiorentina A
0 - 0 D
71%
Cagliari H
1 - 1 D
53%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 55.2 vs 63.0), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Larissa averaging 0.9 and Parma averaging 0.8 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Larissa conceding 1.4 and Parma conceding 1.4 per match.

Larissa has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Parma has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 7 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.2 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Larissa

Larissa

VS
Parma

Parma

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more