Skip to content
Compare Le Havre vs Dender

Le Havre vs Dender Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Le Havre vs Dender: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Le Havre Le Havre Home Team
Dender Dender Away Team
Le Havre
38.0
L D D D D D L D L L

Last 10 Matches

Dender
33.6
L W L L L W L L D D

Categories Won

5

Le Havre

4

Draw

6

Dender

Performance Radar

Le Havre
Dender

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
0%

0W, 6D, 4L

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

-8

-8

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
20%

2 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Samatta (2 goals)
D. Hrnčár (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
56.9

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 64.2

44.9

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 57.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.16

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.16

1.01

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.01

Adjusted Power Rating
38.0

Attack: 35.6, Defense: 53.4, Form: 0.0

33.6

Attack: 31.6, Defense: 38.0, Form: 19.0

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

3
1

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

1
1

76-90+'

1
Le Havre
Dender
Le Havre

Power Rating Breakdown

38.0

Overall

Attack 35.6
Defense 53.4
Form 0.0
Consistency 92.8
Dender

Power Rating Breakdown

33.6

Overall

Attack 31.6
Defense 38.0
Form 19.0
Consistency 59.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

86.0 vs 62.4

Opponent Quality

64.2 vs 57.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Le Havre logo Le Havre
L
Marseille (61%)
D
Lille (78%)
D
Metz (43%)
D
Angers (52%)
D
Nice (60%)
D
Auxerre (66%)
L
Paris FC (77%)
D
Lyon (65%)
Dender logo Dender
L
ZW (59%)
W
La Louvière (38%)
L
Cercle Brugge (51%)
L
Cercle Brugge (46%)
L
ZW (65%)
W
La Louvière (54%)
L
Gent (58%)
L
R. Union SG (80%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Marseille H
0 - 1 L
61%
Lille A
1 - 1 D
78%
Metz H
4 - 4 D
43%
Angers A
1 - 1 D
52%
Nice A
1 - 1 D
60%
Auxerre H
1 - 1 D
66%
Paris FC A
2 - 3 L
77%
Lyon H
0 - 0 D
65%
Brest A
0 - 2 L
61%
Paris SG H
0 - 1 L
79%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
ZW A
1 - 2 L
59%
La Louvière H
2 - 1 W
38%
Cercle Brugge A
1 - 2 L
51%
Cercle Brugge H
1 - 4 L
46%
ZW H
1 - 2 L
65%
La Louvière A
1 - 0 W
54%
Gent H
1 - 3 L
58%
R. Union SG A
0 - 2 L
80%
Charleroi H
2 - 2 D
57%
Cercle Brugge A
0 - 0 D
63%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Le Havre has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 56.9) compared to Dender (SoS: 44.9). This means Le Havre's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Le Havre averaging 1.0 and Dender averaging 1.0 goals per match.

Le Havre has the defensive edge, conceding 1.5 per match compared to Dender's 1.8.

Le Havre has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Le Havre

Le Havre

VS
Dender

Dender

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more