Compare Le Havre vs Genk

Le Havre vs Genk Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Le Havre vs Genk: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Le Havre Home Team

Genk Away Team

Le Havre

38.0

L D D D D D L D L L

Last 10 Matches

Genk

50.6

W L D D W D W D L W

Categories Won

Le Havre

Draw

Genk

Performance Radar

Le Havre

Genk

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

0W, 6D, 4L

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match

1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-5

Clean Sheet

10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

20%

2 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

M. Samatta (2 goals)

A. Bibout (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 4

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 10

Home Win Rate

0W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

0W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

56.9

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 64.2

56.0

League Difficulty: 60.6, Opponent Quality: 52.9

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 3 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.16

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.16

1.53

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.07

Adjusted Power Rating

38.0

Attack: 35.6, Defense: 53.4, Form: 0.0

50.6

Attack: 56.5, Defense: 49.5, Form: 42.4

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Le Havre

Genk

Power Rating Breakdown

38.0

Overall

Attack 35.6

Defense 53.4

Form 0.0

Consistency 92.8

Power Rating Breakdown

50.6

Overall

Attack 56.5

Defense 49.5

Form 42.4

Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

86.0 vs 60.6

Opponent Quality

64.2 vs 52.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Le Havre

Genk

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Marseille H

French Ligue 1

0 - 1 L

61%

Lille A

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

78%

Metz H

French Ligue 1

4 - 4 D

43%

Angers A

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

52%

Nice A

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

60%

Auxerre H

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

66%

Paris FC A

French Ligue 1

2 - 3 L

77%

Lyon H

French Ligue 1

0 - 0 D

65%

Brest A

French Ligue 1

0 - 2 L

61%

Paris SG H

French Ligue 1

0 - 1 L

79%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Westerlo H

Belgian First Division A

3 - 0 W

45%

Charleroi A

Belgian First Division A

0 - 2 L

51%

Standard H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

55%

Charleroi H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

46%

Westerlo A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

50%

OHL H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

47%

Antwerp A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 1 W

57%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

5 - 5 D

54%

Freiburg A

UEFA Europa League

1 - 5 L

69%

Sint-Truiden H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

55%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 56.9 vs 56.0), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Genk holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Le Havre's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Le Havre conceding 1.5 and Genk conceding 1.6 per match.

Le Havre has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Genk has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Genk has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 12.6 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Le Havre

Genk

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair