Skip to content
Compare Lens vs Hajduk

Lens vs Hajduk Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Lens vs Hajduk: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Lens Lens Home Team
Hajduk Hajduk Away Team
Lens
58.8
W D D W W L W L W D

Last 10 Matches

Hajduk
48.5
L W D L D W W W W L

Categories Won

8

Lens

4

Draw

3

Hajduk

Performance Radar

Lens
Hajduk

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 3D, 2L

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
2.3

23 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+8

+8

+7

+7

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
F. Thauvin (5 goals)
M. Livaja (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 14
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
100%

5W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
50.7

League Difficulty: 77.8, Opponent Quality: 56.0

35.3

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 49.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.54

Actual: 2.3 | Diff: -0.24

1.55

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.25

Adjusted Power Rating
58.8

Attack: 77.2, Defense: 50.4, Form: 50.4

48.5

Attack: 51.2, Defense: 54.0, Form: 42.6

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2
3

16-30'

4
3

31-45'

3
7

46-60'

4
5

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

3
Lens
Hajduk
Lens

Power Rating Breakdown

58.8

Overall

Attack 77.2
Defense 50.4
Form 50.4
Consistency 53.2
Hajduk

Power Rating Breakdown

48.5

Overall

Attack 51.2
Defense 54.0
Form 42.6
Consistency 45.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

77.8 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

56.0 vs 49.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Lens logo Lens
W
Nantes (51%)
D
Nice (60%)
D
Brest (61%)
W
Toulouse (40%)
W
Toulouse (57%)
L
Lille (78%)
W
Angers (47%)
L
Lorient (69%)
Hajduk logo Hajduk
L
Dinamo Zagreb (76%)
W
Varaždin (48%)
D
Rijeka (48%)
L
Osijek (40%)
D
Slaven (40%)
W
Gorica (44%)
W
Istra (46%)
W
Vukovar (37%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Nantes H
1 - 0 W
51%
Nice A
1 - 1 D
60%
Brest A
3 - 3 D
61%
Toulouse H
4 - 1 W
40%
Toulouse H
3 - 2 W
57%
Lille A
0 - 3 L
78%
Angers H
5 - 1 W
47%
Lorient A
1 - 2 L
69%
Metz H
3 - 0 W
43%
Lyon A
2 - 2 D
54%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dinamo Zagreb A
0 - 2 L
76%
Varaždin H
3 - 1 W
48%
Rijeka A
0 - 0 D
48%
Osijek H
0 - 1 L
40%
Slaven A
2 - 2 D
40%
Gorica H
1 - 0 W
44%
Istra A
3 - 1 W
46%
Vukovar A
6 - 0 W
37%
Lokomotiva H
2 - 1 W
44%
Dinamo Zagreb H
1 - 3 L
71%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Lens has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 50.7) compared to Hajduk (SoS: 35.3). This means Lens's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Lens holds the attacking edge with 2.3 goals per match versus Hajduk's 1.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Hajduk has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Lens's 1.5.

The home advantage factor favors Lens, who boasts a 100% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Lens has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.3 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Lens

Lens

VS
Hajduk

Hajduk

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more