Compare Lens vs Standard

Lens vs Standard Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Lens vs Standard: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Lens Home Team

Standard Away Team

Lens

58.8

W D D W W L W L W D

Last 10 Matches

Standard

65.8

W W D L W L W D D W

Categories Won

Lens

Draw

Standard

Performance Radar

Lens

Standard

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

50%

5W, 3D, 2L

50%

5W, 3D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match

2.3

23 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.5

15 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

80%

8 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

F. Thauvin (5 goals)

C. Nielsen (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 14

1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 14

Home Win Rate

100%

5W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate

0W / 5 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

50.7

League Difficulty: 77.8, Opponent Quality: 56.0

66.9

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 51.8

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 1 matches

100%

1W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

2.54

Actual: 2.3 | Diff: -0.24

1.77

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.07

Adjusted Power Rating

58.8

Attack: 77.2, Defense: 50.4, Form: 50.4

65.8

Attack: 66.2, Defense: 81.8, Form: 58.5

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Lens

Standard

Power Rating Breakdown

58.8

Overall

Attack 77.2

Defense 50.4

Form 50.4

Consistency 53.2

Power Rating Breakdown

65.8

Overall

Attack 66.2

Defense 81.8

Form 58.5

Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

77.8 vs 59.5

Opponent Quality

56.0 vs 51.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 100%

Lens

Standard

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Nantes H

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

51%

Nice A

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

60%

Brest A

French Ligue 1

3 - 3 D

61%

Toulouse H

Coupe de France

4 - 1 W

40%

Toulouse H

French Ligue 1

3 - 2 W

57%

Lille A

French Ligue 1

0 - 3 L

78%

Angers H

French Ligue 1

5 - 1 W

47%

Lorient A

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

69%

Metz H

French Ligue 1

3 - 0 W

43%

Lyon A

Coupe de France

2 - 2 D

54%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

OHL H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

35%

Antwerp A

Belgian First Division A

5 - 0 W

45%

Genk A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

54%

Antwerp H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

40%

Charleroi A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

51%

Westerlo H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

57%

OHL A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

3 - 1 W

52%

Westerlo H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

57%

Antwerp A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 1 D

57%

ZW A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

70%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Standard has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 66.9) compared to Lens (SoS: 50.7). This means Standard's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Lens holds the attacking edge with 2.3 goals per match versus Standard's 1.7, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Standard has the defensive edge, conceding 0.9 per match compared to Lens's 1.5.

The home advantage factor favors Lens, who boasts a 100% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

Standard is a strong road team with a 67% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Standard has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.0 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Lens

Standard

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair