Compare Malmö vs GC Zürich

Malmö vs GC Zürich Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Malmö vs GC Zürich: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Malmö Home Team

GC Zürich Away Team

Malmö

39.9

L L W L W W D L L L

Last 10 Matches

GC Zürich

27.9

W L L L W L L L L L

Categories Won

Malmö

Draw

GC Zürich

Performance Radar

Malmö

GC Zürich

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

20%

2W, 0D, 8L

Goals Scored / Match

1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.6

16 / 10 matches

2.6

26 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-2

-16

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

S. Hakšabanović (3 goals)

D. Abels (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 7

1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 5

Home Win Rate

25%

1W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

33%

2W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

45.2

League Difficulty: 60.5, Opponent Quality: 60.1

50.4

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.3

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 3 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.44

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.04

1.0

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating

39.9

Attack: 44.4, Defense: 44.4, Form: 28.6

27.9

Attack: 33.5, Defense: 13.4, Form: 20.1

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Malmö

GC Zürich

Power Rating Breakdown

39.9

Overall

Attack 44.4

Defense 44.4

Form 28.6

Consistency 46.0

Power Rating Breakdown

27.9

Overall

Attack 33.5

Defense 13.4

Form 20.1

Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

60.5 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

60.1 vs 51.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Malmö

GC Zürich

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Häcken A

Swedish Allsvenskan

2 - 3 L

58%

Mjällby H

Swedish Allsvenskan

2 - 3 L

54%

AIK A

Swedish Allsvenskan

1 - 0 W

49%

Sirius H

Swedish Allsvenskan

2 - 3 L

65%

Djurgården A

Swedish Allsvenskan

1 - 0 W

59%

GAIS H

Swedish Allsvenskan

3 - 1 W

47%

Örgryte A

Swedish Allsvenskan

1 - 1 D

41%

Genk A

UEFA Europa League

1 - 2 L

70%

Red Star H

UEFA Europa League

0 - 1 L

81%

Porto A

UEFA Europa League

1 - 2 L

77%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Winterthur H

Swiss Super League

3 - 2 W

42%

Zürich A

Swiss Super League

1 - 2 L

42%

Servette H

Swiss Super League

0 - 2 L

65%

Luzern H

Swiss Super League

1 - 2 L

56%

Winterthur A

Brack Super League

2 - 0 W

42%

Sion H

Brack Super League

0 - 4 L

62%

Servette A

Brack Super League

0 - 5 L

66%

Thun A

Brack Super League

1 - 5 L

49%

Lausanne H

Brack Super League

2 - 3 L

38%

Basel A

Brack Super League

0 - 1 L

51%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 45.2 vs 50.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Malmö holds the attacking edge with 1.4 goals per match versus GC Zürich's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Defensively, Malmö is far superior, conceding just 1.6 goals per match with 2 clean sheets, while GC Zürich leaks 2.6 per match.

Malmö has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

GC Zürich has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Malmö has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 12.0 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Malmö

GC Zürich

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair