Compare Marseille vs AZ

Marseille vs AZ Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Marseille vs AZ: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Marseille Home Team

AZ Away Team

Marseille

45.3

W L D L W L L W W D

Last 10 Matches

56.5

D D D D W L W L W W

Categories Won

Marseille

Draw

Performance Radar

Marseille

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-2

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

M. Greenwood (3 goals)

S. Mijnans (5 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7

1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 9

Home Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

53.7

League Difficulty: 81.9, Opponent Quality: 59.9

54.7

League Difficulty: 79.4, Opponent Quality: 65.5

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

0W / 5 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.17

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.07

1.92

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.12

Adjusted Power Rating

45.3

Attack: 38.0, Defense: 58.8, Form: 41.5

56.5

Attack: 62.8, Defense: 66.3, Form: 41.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Marseille

Power Rating Breakdown

45.3

Overall

Attack 38.0

Defense 58.8

Form 41.5

Consistency 44.8

Power Rating Breakdown

56.5

Overall

Attack 62.8

Defense 66.3

Form 41.9

Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

81.9 vs 79.4

Opponent Quality

59.9 vs 65.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Marseille

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Le Havre A

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

58%

Nantes A

French Ligue 1

0 - 3 L

56%

Nice H

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

55%

Lorient A

French Ligue 1

0 - 2 L

69%

Metz H

French Ligue 1

3 - 1 W

43%

Monaco A

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

77%

Lille H

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

73%

Auxerre H

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

66%

Toulouse A

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

62%

Toulouse H

Coupe de France

2 - 2 D

40%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Feyenoord A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

72%

Twente H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 2 D

76%

Go Ahead A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 0 D

70%

Shakhtar D H

UEFA Conference League

2 - 2 D

70%

Heerenveen H

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 0 W

67%

Shakhtar D A

UEFA Conference League

0 - 3 L

75%

Fortuna H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 0 W

56%

Groningen A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 3 L

66%

Sparta Prague A

UEFA Conference League

4 - 0 W

67%

Heracles H

Dutch Eredivisie

4 - 0 W

36%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.7 vs 54.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

AZ holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus Marseille's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Marseille conceding 1.3 and AZ conceding 1.1 per match.

AZ has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

AZ has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.2 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Marseille

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair