Compare Metz vs Dender

Metz vs Dender Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Metz vs Dender: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Metz Home Team

Dender Away Team

Metz

30.1

L L D L L D D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Dender

33.6

L W L L L W L L D D

Categories Won

Metz

Draw

Dender

Performance Radar

Metz

Dender

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

0W, 3D, 7L

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match

1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

2.4

24 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-14

-8

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

G. Kvilitaia (2 goals)

D. Hrnčár (2 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 5

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3

Home Win Rate

0W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

0W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

57.2

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 65.2

44.9

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 57.1

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 4 matches

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.27

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.27

1.01

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.01

Adjusted Power Rating

30.1

Attack: 35.7, Defense: 21.4, Form: 0.0

33.6

Attack: 31.6, Defense: 38.0, Form: 19.0

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Metz

Dender

Power Rating Breakdown

30.1

Overall

Attack 35.7

Defense 21.4

Form 0.0

Consistency 93.7

Power Rating Breakdown

33.6

Overall

Attack 31.6

Defense 38.0

Form 19.0

Consistency 59.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

86.0 vs 62.4

Opponent Quality

65.2 vs 57.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Metz

Dender

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Lorient H

French Ligue 1

0 - 4 L

64%

Monaco H

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

72%

Le Havre A

French Ligue 1

4 - 4 D

58%

Paris FC H

French Ligue 1

1 - 3 L

72%

Marseille A

French Ligue 1

1 - 3 L

66%

Nantes H

French Ligue 1

0 - 0 D

51%

Rennes A

French Ligue 1

0 - 0 D

80%

Toulouse H

French Ligue 1

3 - 4 L

57%

Lens A

French Ligue 1

0 - 3 L

76%

Brest H

French Ligue 1

0 - 1 L

56%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

ZW A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

59%

La Louvière H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

38%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

51%

Cercle Brugge H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 4 L

46%

ZW H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

65%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

54%

Gent H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 3 L

58%

R. Union SG A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

80%

Charleroi H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 2 D

57%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

63%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Metz has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 57.2) compared to Dender (SoS: 44.9). This means Metz's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Metz averaging 1.0 and Dender averaging 1.0 goals per match.

Dender has the defensive edge, conceding 1.8 per match compared to Metz's 2.4.

Metz has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Metz

Dender

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair