Compare Metz vs Larissa

Metz vs Larissa Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Metz vs Larissa: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Metz Home Team

Larissa Away Team

Metz

30.1

L L D L L D D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Larissa

37.4

D D D L D L L L D D

Categories Won

Metz

Draw

Larissa

Performance Radar

Metz

Larissa

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

0W, 3D, 7L

0W, 6D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match

1.0

10 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

2.4

24 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-14

-5

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

G. Kvilitaia (2 goals)

Ľ. Tupta (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 5

1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 8

Home Win Rate

0W / 6 matches

0W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

0W / 4 matches

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

57.2

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 65.2

55.2

League Difficulty: 56.0, Opponent Quality: 54.6

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 4 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.27

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.27

0.95

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.05

Adjusted Power Rating

30.1

Attack: 35.7, Defense: 21.4, Form: 0.0

37.4

Attack: 31.6, Defense: 56.1, Form: 0.0

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Metz

Larissa

Power Rating Breakdown

30.1

Overall

Attack 35.7

Defense 21.4

Form 0.0

Consistency 93.7

Power Rating Breakdown

37.4

Overall

Attack 31.6

Defense 56.1

Form 0.0

Consistency 92.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

86.0 vs 56.0

Opponent Quality

65.2 vs 54.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Metz

Larissa

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Lorient H

French Ligue 1

0 - 4 L

64%

Monaco H

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

72%

Le Havre A

French Ligue 1

4 - 4 D

58%

Paris FC H

French Ligue 1

1 - 3 L

72%

Marseille A

French Ligue 1

1 - 3 L

66%

Nantes H

French Ligue 1

0 - 0 D

51%

Rennes A

French Ligue 1

0 - 0 D

80%

Toulouse H

French Ligue 1

3 - 4 L

57%

Lens A

French Ligue 1

0 - 3 L

76%

Brest H

French Ligue 1

0 - 1 L

56%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Panaitolikos A

Greek Super League

1 - 1 D

53%

Asteras H

Greek Super League

1 - 1 D

56%

Panserraikos A

Greek Super League

1 - 1 D

54%

Panserraikos H

Greek Super League

0 - 1 L

49%

Kifisia H

Greek Super League

1 - 1 D

49%

Atromitos A

Greek Super League

2 - 3 L

59%

Panaitolikos H

Greek Super League

1 - 2 L

48%

Asteras A

Greek Super League

1 - 3 L

61%

Olympiakos A

Greek Super League

0 - 0 D

61%

Asteras H

Greek Super League

1 - 1 D

56%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 57.2 vs 55.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Metz averaging 1.0 and Larissa averaging 0.9 goals per match.

Defensively, Larissa is far superior, conceding just 1.4 goals per match with 1 clean sheets, while Metz leaks 2.4 per match.

Metz has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Larissa has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Larissa has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.3 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Metz

Larissa

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair