Skip to content
Compare Metz vs Thun

Metz vs Thun Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Metz vs Thun: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Metz Metz Home Team
Thun Thun Away Team
Metz
30.1
L L D L L D D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Thun
41.3
L L L W L L W W D W

Categories Won

2

Metz

3

Draw

10

Thun

Performance Radar

Metz
Thun

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
0%

0W, 3D, 7L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.4

24 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-14

-14

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
G. Kvilitaia (2 goals)
E. Rastoder (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
57.2

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 65.2

37.3

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 50.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.27

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.27

1.36

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.24

Adjusted Power Rating
30.1

Attack: 35.7, Defense: 21.4, Form: 0.0

41.3

Attack: 46.6, Defense: 43.6, Form: 34.9

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

4
4

46-60'

4

61-75'

3
2

76-90+'

2
Metz
Thun
Metz

Power Rating Breakdown

30.1

Overall

Attack 35.7
Defense 21.4
Form 0.0
Consistency 93.7
Thun

Power Rating Breakdown

41.3

Overall

Attack 46.6
Defense 43.6
Form 34.9
Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

86.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

65.2 vs 50.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Metz logo Metz
L
Lorient (64%)
L
Monaco (72%)
D
Le Havre (58%)
L
Paris FC (72%)
L
Marseille (66%)
D
Nantes (51%)
D
Rennes (80%)
L
Toulouse (57%)
Thun logo Thun
L
Sion (70%)
L
Basel (55%)
L
Lugano (54%)
W
Basel (50%)
L
Lugano (55%)
L
Zürich (37%)
W
GC Zürich (27%)
W
Young Boys (56%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Lorient H
0 - 4 L
64%
Monaco H
1 - 2 L
72%
Le Havre A
4 - 4 D
58%
Paris FC H
1 - 3 L
72%
Marseille A
1 - 3 L
66%
Nantes H
0 - 0 D
51%
Rennes A
0 - 0 D
80%
Toulouse H
3 - 4 L
57%
Lens A
0 - 3 L
76%
Brest H
0 - 1 L
56%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sion A
0 - 2 L
70%
Basel A
1 - 3 L
55%
Lugano H
0 - 1 L
54%
Basel H
3 - 1 W
50%
Lugano A
0 - 1 L
55%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
37%
GC Zürich H
5 - 1 W
27%
Young Boys A
2 - 1 W
56%
St.Gallen H
2 - 2 D
55%
Luzern H
2 - 1 W
47%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Metz has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 57.2) compared to Thun (SoS: 37.3). This means Metz's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Thun holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Metz's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Defensively, Thun is far superior, conceding just 1.5 goals per match with 0 clean sheets, while Metz leaks 2.4 per match.

Metz has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Thun has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.2 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Metz

Metz

VS
Thun

Thun

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more