Compare Monaco vs NAC

Monaco vs NAC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Monaco vs NAC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Monaco Home Team

NAC Away Team

Monaco

67.7

L W D D L W W W W W

Last 10 Matches

NAC

33.2

W L L D D L L D L W

Categories Won

Monaco

Draw

NAC

Performance Radar

Monaco

NAC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

60%

6W, 2D, 2L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match

1.8

18 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-11

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

F. Balogun (8 goals)

M. Nassoh (2 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 13

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4

Home Win Rate

60%

3W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

60%

3W / 5 matches

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

69.4

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 64.4

53.8

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.3

Elite Opponent Record

50%

2W / 4 matches

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

2.08

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.28

0.91

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.11

Adjusted Power Rating

67.7

Attack: 71.6, Defense: 67.7, Form: 71.6

33.2

Attack: 27.7, Defense: 38.1, Form: 20.8

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Monaco

NAC

Power Rating Breakdown

67.7

Overall

Attack 71.6

Defense 67.7

Form 71.6

Consistency 52.0

Power Rating Breakdown

33.2

Overall

Attack 27.7

Defense 38.1

Form 20.8

Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

86.0 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

64.4 vs 62.3

Elite Opponent Record

50% vs 0%

Monaco

NAC

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Lille H

French Ligue 1

0 - 1 L

73%

Metz A

French Ligue 1

2 - 1 W

48%

Toulouse A

French Ligue 1

2 - 2 D

62%

Auxerre H

French Ligue 1

2 - 2 D

66%

Paris FC A

French Ligue 1

1 - 4 L

77%

Marseille H

French Ligue 1

2 - 1 W

61%

Lyon A

French Ligue 1

2 - 1 W

70%

Brest H

French Ligue 1

2 - 0 W

56%

Paris SG A

French Ligue 1

3 - 1 W

84%

Angers H

French Ligue 1

2 - 0 W

47%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Heerenveen H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 0 W

67%

Utrecht A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 2 L

75%

Ajax H

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 2 L

62%

Fortuna A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

61%

Sparta H

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 0 D

44%

Zwolle A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 2 L

59%

Go Ahead A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 6 L

70%

Feyenoord H

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 3 D

67%

Telstar A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 3 L

69%

Volendam H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 0 W

49%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Monaco has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 69.4) compared to NAC (SoS: 53.8). This means Monaco's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Monaco's attack is on another level, averaging 1.8 goals per match with F. Balogun leading the charge with 8 goals. NAC manages just 0.8 per match.

Monaco has the defensive edge, conceding 1.3 per match compared to NAC's 1.9.

Monaco has proven their mettle against elite opponents, winning 2 of 4 matches against top-tier teams. This is a crucial indicator of their ability to perform under pressure.

Monaco is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Based on our comprehensive analysis including opponent quality adjustment, Monaco is the clear and decisive favorite. Their superiority across attack (71.6), defense (67.7), and form (71.6) leaves little room for doubt. NAC will need an exceptional performance to compete.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Monaco

NAC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair