Skip to content
Compare NAC vs AGF

NAC vs AGF Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare NAC vs AGF: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

NAC NAC Home Team
AGF AGF Away Team
NAC
33.2
W L L D D L L D L W

Last 10 Matches

AGF
52.9
W W D D L D W D D W

Categories Won

2

NAC

5

Draw

8

AGF

Performance Radar

NAC
AGF

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

40%

4W, 5D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-11

-11

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Nassoh (2 goals)
T. Bech (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.8

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.3

52.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.91

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.11

1.14

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
33.2

Attack: 27.7, Defense: 38.1, Form: 20.8

52.9

Attack: 41.0, Defense: 75.1, Form: 41.0

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

2
NAC
AGF
NAC

Power Rating Breakdown

33.2

Overall

Attack 27.7
Defense 38.1
Form 20.8
Consistency 61.3
AGF

Power Rating Breakdown

52.9

Overall

Attack 41.0
Defense 75.1
Form 41.0
Consistency 63.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

62.3 vs 50.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
NAC logo NAC
W
Heerenveen (67%)
L
Utrecht (75%)
L
Ajax (62%)
D
Fortuna (61%)
D
Sparta (44%)
L
Zwolle (59%)
L
Go Ahead (70%)
D
Feyenoord (67%)
AGF logo AGF
W
Brøndby (49%)
W
Sønderjyske (43%)
D
Midtjylland (52%)
D
Nordsjælland (60%)
L
Midtjylland (57%)
D
Nordsjælland (55%)
W
Viborg (55%)
D
Brøndby (44%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Heerenveen H
2 - 0 W
67%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
75%
Ajax H
0 - 2 L
62%
Fortuna A
1 - 1 D
61%
Sparta H
0 - 0 D
44%
Zwolle A
1 - 2 L
59%
Go Ahead A
0 - 6 L
70%
Feyenoord H
3 - 3 D
67%
Telstar A
0 - 3 L
69%
Volendam H
1 - 0 W
49%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Brøndby A
2 - 0 W
49%
Sønderjyske H
2 - 1 W
43%
Midtjylland H
0 - 0 D
52%
Nordsjælland A
1 - 1 D
60%
Midtjylland A
1 - 2 L
57%
Nordsjælland H
1 - 1 D
55%
Viborg A
2 - 1 W
55%
Brøndby H
0 - 0 D
44%
Sønderjyske A
1 - 1 D
48%
Vejle A
2 - 1 W
44%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.8 vs 52.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

AGF holds the attacking edge with 1.2 goals per match versus NAC's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Defensively, AGF is far superior, conceding just 0.8 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while NAC leaks 1.9 per match.

AGF has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.4 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

AGF emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (52.9 vs 33.2) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

NAC

NAC

VS
AGF

AGF

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more