Compare NAC vs Gent

NAC vs Gent Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare NAC vs Gent: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

NAC Home Team

Gent Away Team

NAC

33.2

W L L D D L L D L W

Last 10 Matches

Gent

46.6

D L L D D L D W W W

Categories Won

NAC

Draw

Gent

Performance Radar

NAC

Gent

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

30%

3W, 4D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match

0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-11

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

40%

4 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

M. Nassoh (2 goals)

M. Dean (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 4

Home Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate

0W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

53.8

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.3

53.6

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 49.6

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

0.91

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.11

0.82

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.28

Adjusted Power Rating

33.2

Attack: 27.7, Defense: 38.1, Form: 20.8

46.6

Attack: 38.0, Defense: 69.1, Form: 31.1

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

NAC

Gent

Power Rating Breakdown

33.2

Overall

Attack 27.7

Defense 38.1

Form 20.8

Consistency 61.3

Power Rating Breakdown

46.6

Overall

Attack 38.0

Defense 69.1

Form 31.1

Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 59.5

Opponent Quality

62.3 vs 49.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

NAC

Gent

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Heerenveen H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 0 W

67%

Utrecht A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 2 L

75%

Ajax H

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 2 L

62%

Fortuna A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

61%

Sparta H

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 0 D

44%

Zwolle A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 2 L

59%

Go Ahead A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 6 L

70%

Feyenoord H

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 3 D

67%

Telstar A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 3 L

69%

Volendam H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 0 W

49%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Anderlecht H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

35%

Mechelen A

Belgian First Division A

0 - 1 L

34%

Club Brugge H

Belgian First Division A

0 - 2 L

66%

R. Union SG A

Belgian First Division A

0 - 0 D

69%

Sint-Truiden H

Belgian First Division A

0 - 0 D

44%

Anderlecht A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 3 L

52%

Mechelen H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 1 D

40%

Dender A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

3 - 1 W

51%

ZW H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 0 W

65%

Mechelen H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

3 - 1 W

40%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.8 vs 53.6), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Gent holds the attacking edge with 1.1 goals per match versus NAC's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Defensively, Gent is far superior, conceding just 1.0 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while NAC leaks 1.9 per match.

Gent has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.4 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Gent has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 13.4 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

NAC

Gent

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair