Compare NAC vs Zlín

NAC vs Zlín Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare NAC vs Zlín: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

NAC Home Team

Zlín Away Team

NAC

33.2

W L L D D L L D L W

Last 10 Matches

Zlín

37.7

L D W L W L L L L W

Categories Won

NAC

Draw

Zlín

Performance Radar

NAC

Zlín

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match

0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.9

19 / 10 matches

2.5

25 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-11

-9

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

40%

4 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

30%

3 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

M. Nassoh (2 goals)

T. Poznar (6 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4

1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 8

Home Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate

0W / 5 matches

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

53.8

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.3

55.7

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 54.1

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 2 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

0.91

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.11

1.65

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.05

Adjusted Power Rating

33.2

Attack: 27.7, Defense: 38.1, Form: 20.8

37.7

Attack: 56.4, Defense: 17.6, Form: 31.7

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

NAC

Zlín

Power Rating Breakdown

33.2

Overall

Attack 27.7

Defense 38.1

Form 20.8

Consistency 61.3

Power Rating Breakdown

37.7

Overall

Attack 56.4

Defense 17.6

Form 31.7

Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 58.0

Opponent Quality

62.3 vs 54.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

NAC

Zlín

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Heerenveen H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 0 W

67%

Utrecht A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 2 L

75%

Ajax H

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 2 L

62%

Fortuna A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

61%

Sparta H

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 0 D

44%

Zwolle A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 2 L

59%

Go Ahead A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 6 L

70%

Feyenoord H

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 3 D

67%

Telstar A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 3 L

69%

Volendam H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 0 W

49%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Teplice H

Czech First League

2 - 4 L

49%

Ml. Boleslav A

Czech First League

1 - 1 D

66%

Dukla H

Czech First League

2 - 1 W

46%

Pardubice A

Czech First League

1 - 3 L

62%

Teplice H

Czech First League

3 - 2 W

49%

Bohemians A

Czech First League

1 - 2 L

58%

Jablonec H

Czech First League

0 - 3 L

44%

Slavia Prague H

Czech First League

1 - 3 L

69%

Ostrava A

Czech First League

2 - 6 L

39%

Plzeň H

Czech First League

3 - 0 W

59%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.8 vs 55.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Zlín holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus NAC's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

NAC has the defensive edge, conceding 1.9 per match compared to Zlín's 2.5.

Zlín has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.4 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

NAC

Zlín

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair