Skip to content
Compare NEC vs Winterthur

NEC vs Winterthur Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare NEC vs Winterthur: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

NEC NEC Home Team
Winterthur Winterthur Away Team
NEC
56.6
L D D D W D W W L D

Last 10 Matches

Winterthur
33.7
L W D L L L L W D D

Categories Won

11

NEC

3

Draw

1

Winterthur

Performance Radar

NEC
Winterthur

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 5D, 2L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+4

+4

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
B. Linssen (5 goals)
N. Burkart (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
67.5

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 65.7

36.6

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 48.5

Elite Opponent Record
50%

1W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.04

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.34

1.46

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
56.6

Attack: 66.6, Defense: 66.6, Form: 35.2

33.7

Attack: 40.4, Defense: 28.9, Form: 17.3

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

4
4

16-30'

1
3

31-45'

4
3

46-60'

3
3

61-75'

1
4

76-90+'

1
NEC
Winterthur
NEC

Power Rating Breakdown

56.6

Overall

Attack 66.6
Defense 66.6
Form 35.2
Consistency 62.8
Winterthur

Power Rating Breakdown

33.7

Overall

Attack 40.4
Defense 28.9
Form 17.3
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

65.7 vs 48.5

Elite Opponent Record

50% vs 0%
NEC logo NEC
L
Groningen (66%)
D
Telstar (64%)
D
Twente (81%)
D
Feyenoord (67%)
W
Excelsior (60%)
D
Heerenveen (67%)
W
PSV (80%)
W
Volendam (49%)
Winterthur logo Winterthur
L
GC Zürich (36%)
W
Lausanne (42%)
D
Zürich (37%)
L
Servette (70%)
L
GC Zürich (27%)
L
Lausanne (43%)
L
Basel (46%)
W
Luzern (57%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Groningen A
1 - 2 L
66%
Telstar H
1 - 1 D
64%
Twente A
1 - 1 D
81%
Feyenoord H
1 - 1 D
67%
Excelsior A
2 - 0 W
60%
Heerenveen H
2 - 2 D
67%
PSV A
3 - 2 W
80%
Volendam H
3 - 0 W
49%
Fortuna H
2 - 3 L
56%
Ajax A
1 - 1 D
67%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
GC Zürich A
2 - 3 L
36%
Lausanne H
2 - 1 W
42%
Zürich H
2 - 2 D
37%
Servette A
3 - 5 L
70%
GC Zürich H
0 - 2 L
27%
Lausanne A
1 - 2 L
43%
Basel H
0 - 2 L
46%
Luzern A
2 - 1 W
57%
Sion A
1 - 1 D
66%
Servette H
1 - 1 D
61%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

NEC has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 67.5) compared to Winterthur (SoS: 36.6). This means NEC's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

NEC holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Winterthur's 1.4, though the gap is not insurmountable.

NEC has the defensive edge, conceding 1.3 per match compared to Winterthur's 2.0.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

NEC emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (56.6 vs 33.7) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

NEC

NEC

VS
Winterthur

Winterthur

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more