Skip to content
Compare Slaven vs Mechelen

Slaven vs Mechelen Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Slaven vs Mechelen: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Slaven Slaven Home Team
Mechelen Mechelen Away Team
Slaven
31.9
W L D L D L L D L D

Last 10 Matches

Mechelen
26.6
L W L L L L D L W L

Categories Won

7

Slaven

5

Draw

3

Mechelen

Performance Radar

Slaven
Mechelen

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 4D, 5L

20%

2W, 1D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

2.4

24 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

-16

-16

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Dabro (3 goals)
B. Boersma (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
35.1

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 48.8

44.7

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 59.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.04

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.16

0.83

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.03

Adjusted Power Rating
31.9

Attack: 34.0, Defense: 31.2, Form: 8.5

26.6

Attack: 25.3, Defense: 18.9, Form: 18.9

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

2
5

31-45'

3

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

1
1

76-90+'

2
Slaven
Mechelen
Slaven

Power Rating Breakdown

31.9

Overall

Attack 34.0
Defense 31.2
Form 8.5
Consistency 75.7
Mechelen

Power Rating Breakdown

26.6

Overall

Attack 25.3
Defense 18.9
Form 18.9
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 59.5

Opponent Quality

48.8 vs 59.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Slaven logo Slaven
W
Gorica (44%)
L
Istra (46%)
D
Vukovar (32%)
L
Lokomotiva (49%)
D
Hajduk (53%)
L
Varaždin (54%)
L
Rijeka (44%)
D
Osijek (40%)
Mechelen logo Mechelen
L
R. Union SG (69%)
W
Gent (46%)
L
Sint-Truiden (44%)
L
Club Brugge (71%)
L
Anderlecht (35%)
L
R. Union SG (75%)
D
Gent (63%)
L
Club Brugge (83%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Gorica H
1 - 0 W
44%
Istra A
1 - 3 L
46%
Vukovar H
2 - 2 D
32%
Lokomotiva A
1 - 2 L
49%
Hajduk H
2 - 2 D
53%
Varaždin A
1 - 2 L
54%
Rijeka H
0 - 2 L
44%
Osijek H
0 - 0 D
40%
Dinamo Zagreb A
2 - 4 L
76%
Gorica A
2 - 2 D
50%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
R. Union SG A
0 - 3 L
69%
Gent H
1 - 0 W
46%
Sint-Truiden H
1 - 4 L
44%
Club Brugge A
1 - 6 L
71%
Anderlecht H
1 - 2 L
35%
R. Union SG H
0 - 1 L
75%
Gent A
1 - 1 D
63%
Club Brugge A
1 - 4 L
83%
Anderlecht H
1 - 0 W
47%
Gent A
1 - 3 L
63%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 35.1 vs 44.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Slaven holds the attacking edge with 1.2 goals per match versus Mechelen's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Slaven has the defensive edge, conceding 1.9 per match compared to Mechelen's 2.4.

Mechelen has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Slaven has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.3 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Slaven

Slaven

VS
Mechelen

Mechelen

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more