Skip to content
Compare Liberec vs Midtjylland

Liberec vs Midtjylland Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Liberec vs Midtjylland: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Liberec Liberec Home Team
Midtjylland Midtjylland Away Team
Liberec
35.3
L L W D L W D D L L

Last 10 Matches

Midtjylland
43.7
D D D W W W D D L L

Categories Won

2

Liberec

5

Draw

8

Midtjylland

Performance Radar

Liberec
Midtjylland

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
0.7

7 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
R. Krollis (3 goals)
M. Erlić (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
43.4

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 57.6

42.6

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 55.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.75

Actual: 0.7 | Diff: -0.05

1.36

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
35.3

Attack: 21.8, Defense: 56.0, Form: 18.7

43.7

Attack: 40.1, Defense: 55.6, Form: 27.8

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

4
1

61-75'

2
1

76-90+'

4
Liberec
Midtjylland
Liberec

Power Rating Breakdown

35.3

Overall

Attack 21.8
Defense 56.0
Form 18.7
Consistency 61.3
Midtjylland

Power Rating Breakdown

43.7

Overall

Attack 40.1
Defense 55.6
Form 27.8
Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

58.0 vs 58.0

Opponent Quality

57.6 vs 55.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Liberec logo Liberec
L
Plzeň (64%)
L
Slavia Prague (69%)
W
Jablonec (49%)
D
Ml. Boleslav (61%)
L
Karviná (48%)
W
Slovácko (45%)
D
Teplice (49%)
D
Bohemians (58%)
Midtjylland logo Midtjylland
D
Nordsjælland (60%)
D
Viborg (50%)
D
AGF (62%)
W
Sønderjyske (48%)
W
AGF (57%)
W
Brøndby (49%)
D
Sønderjyske (43%)
D
Viborg (55%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Plzeň A
0 - 2 L
64%
Slavia Prague H
1 - 2 L
69%
Jablonec A
2 - 1 W
49%
Ml. Boleslav H
0 - 0 D
61%
Karviná A
1 - 3 L
48%
Slovácko H
2 - 1 W
45%
Teplice H
1 - 1 D
49%
Bohemians A
0 - 0 D
58%
Hradec Kr. H
0 - 1 L
59%
Slavia Prague A
0 - 1 L
74%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Nordsjælland A
0 - 0 D
60%
Viborg H
3 - 3 D
50%
AGF A
0 - 0 D
62%
Sønderjyske A
2 - 1 W
48%
AGF H
2 - 1 W
57%
Brøndby A
2 - 1 W
49%
Sønderjyske H
2 - 2 D
43%
Viborg A
1 - 1 D
55%
Nottm Forest H
1 - 2 L
76%
Nordsjælland H
0 - 1 L
55%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 43.4 vs 42.6), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Midtjylland holds the attacking edge with 1.3 goals per match versus Liberec's 0.7, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Liberec conceding 1.2 and Midtjylland conceding 1.2 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.2 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Midtjylland has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 8.4 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Liberec

Liberec

VS
Midtjylland

Midtjylland

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more