Skip to content
Compare Standard vs Go Ahead

Standard vs Go Ahead Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Standard vs Go Ahead: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Standard Standard Home Team
Go Ahead Go Ahead Away Team
Standard
65.8
W W D L W L W D D W

Last 10 Matches

Go Ahead
56.1
L D D D W L W L W W

Categories Won

7

Standard

3

Draw

5

Go Ahead

Performance Radar

Standard
Go Ahead

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 3D, 2L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+8

+8

+8

+8

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
C. Nielsen (3 goals)
J. Breum (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 14
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 12
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
67%

4W / 6 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
66.9

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 51.8

53.2

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 60.7

Elite Opponent Record
100%

1W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.77

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.07

2.0

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating
65.8

Attack: 66.2, Defense: 81.8, Form: 58.5

56.1

Attack: 68.8, Defense: 61.9, Form: 41.3

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

4

16-30'

2
3

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

5
4

61-75'

4
8

76-90+'

3
Standard
Go Ahead
Standard

Power Rating Breakdown

65.8

Overall

Attack 66.2
Defense 81.8
Form 58.5
Consistency 53.2
Go Ahead

Power Rating Breakdown

56.1

Overall

Attack 68.8
Defense 61.9
Form 41.3
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

59.5 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

51.8 vs 60.7

Elite Opponent Record

100% vs 0%
Standard logo Standard
W
OHL (35%)
W
Antwerp (45%)
D
Genk (54%)
L
Antwerp (40%)
W
Charleroi (51%)
L
Westerlo (57%)
W
OHL (52%)
D
Westerlo (57%)
Go Ahead logo Go Ahead
L
PSV (75%)
D
Sparta (49%)
D
AZ (67%)
D
Groningen (66%)
W
Zwolle (54%)
L
Utrecht (75%)
W
NAC (49%)
L
Twente (76%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
OHL H
2 - 1 W
35%
Antwerp A
5 - 0 W
45%
Genk A
1 - 1 D
54%
Antwerp H
1 - 2 L
40%
Charleroi A
2 - 1 W
51%
Westerlo H
1 - 2 L
57%
OHL A
3 - 1 W
52%
Westerlo H
0 - 0 D
57%
Antwerp A
1 - 1 D
57%
ZW A
1 - 0 W
70%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
PSV H
1 - 4 L
75%
Sparta A
2 - 2 D
49%
AZ H
0 - 0 D
67%
Groningen A
0 - 0 D
66%
Zwolle H
5 - 0 W
54%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
75%
NAC H
6 - 0 W
49%
Twente H
1 - 4 L
76%
Excelsior A
1 - 0 W
60%
Heracles H
4 - 0 W
36%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Standard has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 66.9) compared to Go Ahead (SoS: 53.2). This means Standard's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Go Ahead holds the attacking edge with 2.0 goals per match versus Standard's 1.7, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Standard conceding 0.9 and Go Ahead conceding 1.2 per match.

Go Ahead has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Standard is a strong road team with a 67% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Standard has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.7 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Standard

Standard

VS
Go Ahead

Go Ahead

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more