Compare Standard vs NEC

Standard vs NEC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Standard vs NEC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Standard Home Team

NEC Away Team

Standard

65.8

W W D L W L W D D W

Last 10 Matches

NEC

56.6

L D D D W D W W L D

Categories Won

Standard

Draw

NEC

Performance Radar

Standard

NEC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

50%

5W, 3D, 2L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match

1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

C. Nielsen (3 goals)

B. Linssen (5 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 14

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10

Home Win Rate

25%

1W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

67%

4W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

66.9

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 51.8

67.5

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 65.7

Elite Opponent Record

100%

1W / 1 matches

50%

1W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.77

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.07

2.04

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.34

Adjusted Power Rating

65.8

Attack: 66.2, Defense: 81.8, Form: 58.5

56.6

Attack: 66.6, Defense: 66.6, Form: 35.2

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Standard

NEC

Power Rating Breakdown

65.8

Overall

Attack 66.2

Defense 81.8

Form 58.5

Consistency 53.2

Power Rating Breakdown

56.6

Overall

Attack 66.6

Defense 66.6

Form 35.2

Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

59.5 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

51.8 vs 65.7

Elite Opponent Record

100% vs 50%

Standard

NEC

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

OHL H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

35%

Antwerp A

Belgian First Division A

5 - 0 W

45%

Genk A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

54%

Antwerp H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

40%

Charleroi A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

51%

Westerlo H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

57%

OHL A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

3 - 1 W

52%

Westerlo H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

57%

Antwerp A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 1 D

57%

ZW A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

70%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Groningen A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 2 L

66%

Telstar H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

64%

Twente A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

81%

Feyenoord H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

67%

Excelsior A

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 0 W

60%

Heerenveen H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 2 D

67%

PSV A

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 2 W

80%

Volendam H

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 0 W

49%

Fortuna H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 3 L

56%

Ajax A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

67%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 66.9 vs 67.5), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Standard averaging 1.7 and NEC averaging 1.7 goals per match.

Standard has the defensive edge, conceding 0.9 per match compared to NEC's 1.3.

Standard is a strong road team with a 67% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Standard has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.2 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Standard

NEC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair