Standard vs Thun Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Standard vs Thun: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Standard
Home Team
Thun
Away Team
Compare...
Categories Won
Standard
Draw
Thun
Performance Radar
Statistical Comparison
5W, 3D, 2L
4W, 1D, 5L
17 / 10 matches
16 / 10 matches
9 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
+8
+1
3 / 10 matches
0 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
1W / 4 matches
3W / 5 matches
4W / 6 matches
1W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 51.8
League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.2
1W / 1 matches
0W / 1 matches
Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.07
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.23
Attack: 66.2, Defense: 81.8, Form: 58.5
Attack: 46.7, Defense: 43.8, Form: 35.0
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Standard
Thun
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.
Standard has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 66.9) compared to Thun (SoS: 37.5). This means Standard's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.
Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Standard averaging 1.7 and Thun averaging 1.6 goals per match.
Standard has the defensive edge, conceding 0.9 per match compared to Thun's 1.5.
Standard is a strong road team with a 67% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.
Standard emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (65.8 vs 41.4) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Standard
Thun
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Popular Teams