Thun vs Genk Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Thun vs Genk: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Thun
Home Team
Genk
Away Team
Compare...
Categories Won
Thun
Draw
Genk
Performance Radar
Statistical Comparison
4W, 1D, 5L
4W, 4D, 2L
16 / 10 matches
16 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
16 / 10 matches
+1
0
0 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
3W / 5 matches
2W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
2W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 50.6
League Difficulty: 60.6, Opponent Quality: 52.9
0W / 1 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.24
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.07
Attack: 46.6, Defense: 43.6, Form: 34.9
Attack: 56.5, Defense: 49.5, Form: 42.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Thun
Genk
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.
Genk has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 56.0) compared to Thun (SoS: 37.3). This means Genk's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.
Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Thun averaging 1.6 and Genk averaging 1.6 goals per match.
Both defenses are comparable, with Thun conceding 1.5 and Genk conceding 1.6 per match.
Genk has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.
Genk has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.3 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Thun
Genk
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Popular Teams