Skip to content
Compare Thun vs SK Poltava

Thun vs SK Poltava Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Thun vs SK Poltava: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Thun Thun Home Team
SK Poltava SK Poltava Away Team
Thun
41.4
L L L W L L W W D W

Last 10 Matches

SK Poltava
23.0
L D L D L D L L L L

Categories Won

11

Thun

3

Draw

1

SK Poltava

Performance Radar

Thun
SK Poltava

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 1D, 5L

0%

0W, 3D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

0.7

7 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

2.9

29 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

-22

-22

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
E. Rastoder (3 goals)
V. Sad (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 3
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.5

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.2

64.1

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 71.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 7 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.37

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.23

0.94

Actual: 0.7 | Diff: -0.24

Adjusted Power Rating
41.4

Attack: 46.7, Defense: 43.8, Form: 35.0

23.0

Attack: 26.6, Defense: 3.8, Form: 0.0

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2
3

16-30'

1
4

31-45'

1
4

46-60'

2
3

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

Thun
SK Poltava
Thun

Power Rating Breakdown

41.4

Overall

Attack 46.7
Defense 43.8
Form 35.0
Consistency 39.7
SK Poltava

Power Rating Breakdown

23.0

Overall

Attack 26.6
Defense 3.8
Form 0.0
Consistency 93.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

49.0 vs 98.0

Opponent Quality

51.2 vs 71.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Thun logo Thun
L
Sion (70%)
L
Basel (55%)
L
Lugano (54%)
W
Basel (50%)
L
Lugano (55%)
L
Zürich (38%)
W
GC Zürich (27%)
W
Young Boys (56%)
SK Poltava logo SK Poltava
L
Shakhtar D (78%)
D
Kryvbas KR (71%)
L
Kolos (83%)
D
Obolon (63%)
L
Polissya (77%)
D
Oleksandria (44%)
L
Metalist 1925 (79%)
L
Karpaty Lviv (81%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sion A
0 - 2 L
70%
Basel A
1 - 3 L
55%
Lugano H
0 - 1 L
54%
Basel H
3 - 1 W
50%
Lugano A
0 - 1 L
55%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
38%
GC Zürich H
5 - 1 W
27%
Young Boys A
2 - 1 W
56%
St.Gallen H
2 - 2 D
55%
Luzern H
2 - 1 W
52%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Shakhtar D H
0 - 4 L
78%
Kryvbas KR H
3 - 3 D
71%
Kolos A
0 - 2 L
83%
Obolon A
1 - 1 D
63%
Polissya H
0 - 4 L
77%
Oleksandria H
3 - 3 D
44%
Metalist 1925 A
0 - 2 L
79%
Karpaty Lviv H
0 - 4 L
81%
Zorya A
0 - 4 L
80%
Kudrivka H
0 - 2 L
55%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

SK Poltava has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 64.1) compared to Thun (SoS: 37.5). This means SK Poltava's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Thun holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus SK Poltava's 0.7, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Defensively, Thun is far superior, conceding just 1.5 goals per match with 0 clean sheets, while SK Poltava leaks 2.9 per match.

SK Poltava has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 7 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Thun emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (41.4 vs 23.0) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Thun

Thun

VS
SK Poltava

SK Poltava

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more