Skip to content
Compare Young Boys vs Brann

Young Boys vs Brann Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Young Boys vs Brann: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Young Boys Young Boys Home Team
Brann Brann Away Team
Young Boys
52.2
W L L D D D W L W W

Last 10 Matches

Brann
45.1
W W D L L W L L L L

Categories Won

8

Young Boys

5

Draw

2

Brann

Performance Radar

Young Boys
Brann

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 3D, 3L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+6

+6

+5

+5

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Sanches (4 goals)
K. Ingason (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 13
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.6

League Difficulty: 48.0, Opponent Quality: 50.7

42.3

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 55.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.49

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.21

2.14

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.24

Adjusted Power Rating
52.2

Attack: 56.4, Defense: 63.1, Form: 39.8

45.1

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 49.2, Form: 27.7

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

5
3

46-60'

4
5

61-75'

2
5

76-90+'

4
Young Boys
Brann
Young Boys

Power Rating Breakdown

52.2

Overall

Attack 56.4
Defense 63.1
Form 39.8
Consistency 50.5
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

45.1

Overall

Attack 58.5
Defense 49.2
Form 27.7
Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

48.0 vs 57.0

Opponent Quality

50.7 vs 55.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Young Boys logo Young Boys
W
Basel (50%)
L
Lugano (59%)
L
St.Gallen (59%)
D
Servette (61%)
D
Basel (51%)
D
Lugano (50%)
W
Lausanne (43%)
L
Thun (44%)
Brann logo Brann
W
Fredrikstad (39%)
W
Tromsø (68%)
D
Rosenborg (46%)
L
Viking (70%)
L
Sandefjord (50%)
W
HamKam (55%)
L
Tromsø (63%)
L
Kristiansund (48%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Basel H
3 - 0 W
50%
Lugano A
0 - 1 L
59%
St.Gallen H
1 - 2 L
59%
Servette H
1 - 1 D
61%
Basel A
3 - 3 D
51%
Lugano H
1 - 1 D
50%
Lausanne A
2 - 0 W
43%
Thun H
1 - 2 L
44%
Luzern A
2 - 1 W
57%
Zürich H
3 - 0 W
33%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fredrikstad H
3 - 1 W
39%
Tromsø A
5 - 0 W
68%
Rosenborg A
1 - 1 D
46%
Viking A
2 - 3 L
70%
Sandefjord H
0 - 1 L
50%
HamKam A
5 - 1 W
55%
Tromsø H
1 - 2 L
63%
Kristiansund A
2 - 3 L
48%
Bologna A
0 - 1 L
61%
Bologna H
0 - 1 L
56%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 49.6 vs 42.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Young Boys averaging 1.7 and Brann averaging 1.9 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Young Boys conceding 1.1 and Brann conceding 1.4 per match.

Young Boys has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Young Boys has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.1 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Young Boys

Young Boys

VS
Brann

Brann

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more