Compare ZW vs NEC

ZW vs NEC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare ZW vs NEC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

ZW Home Team

NEC Away Team

60.1

W W W W W D W L L L

Last 10 Matches

NEC

56.6

L D D D W D W W L D

Categories Won

Draw

NEC

Performance Radar

NEC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

60%

6W, 1D, 3L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match

1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

J. Opoku (5 goals)

B. Linssen (5 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10

Home Win Rate

60%

3W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

60%

3W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

55.4

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 50.7

67.5

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 65.7

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 0 matches

50%

1W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.84

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.14

2.04

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.34

Adjusted Power Rating

60.1

Attack: 59.7, Defense: 66.8, Form: 63.2

56.6

Attack: 66.6, Defense: 66.6, Form: 35.2

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

NEC

Power Rating Breakdown

60.1

Overall

Attack 59.7

Defense 66.8

Form 63.2

Consistency 43.3

Power Rating Breakdown

56.6

Overall

Attack 66.6

Defense 66.6

Form 35.2

Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.4 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

50.7 vs 65.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 50%

NEC

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Dender H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

35%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian First Division A

3 - 2 W

51%

La Louvière H

Belgian First Division A

4 - 0 W

38%

La Louvière A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 0 W

42%

Dender A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 1 W

51%

Cercle Brugge H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 2 D

58%

Charleroi H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

57%

Gent A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

63%

Standard H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 1 L

67%

Mechelen A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

45%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Groningen A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 2 L

66%

Telstar H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

64%

Twente A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

81%

Feyenoord H

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

67%

Excelsior A

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 0 W

60%

Heerenveen H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 2 D

67%

PSV A

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 2 W

80%

Volendam H

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 0 W

49%

Fortuna H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 3 L

56%

Ajax A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

67%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

NEC has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 67.5) compared to ZW (SoS: 55.4). This means NEC's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with ZW averaging 1.7 and NEC averaging 1.7 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with ZW conceding 1.1 and NEC conceding 1.3 per match.

ZW has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

ZW is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

NEC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair