Skip to content
Compare Brann vs NEC

Brann vs NEC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Brann vs NEC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Brann Brann Home Team
NEC NEC Away Team
Brann
45.1
W W D L L W L L L L

Last 10 Matches

NEC
56.6
L D D D W D W W L D

Categories Won

5

Brann

2

Draw

8

NEC

Performance Radar

Brann
NEC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+5

+5

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Ingason (4 goals)
B. Linssen (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
42.3

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 55.6

67.5

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 65.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

50%

1W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.14

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.24

2.04

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.34

Adjusted Power Rating
45.1

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 49.2, Form: 27.7

56.6

Attack: 66.6, Defense: 66.6, Form: 35.2

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

3

16-30'

4
5

31-45'

3
4

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

3
4

76-90+'

4
Brann
NEC
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

45.1

Overall

Attack 58.5
Defense 49.2
Form 27.7
Consistency 46.0
NEC

Power Rating Breakdown

56.6

Overall

Attack 66.6
Defense 66.6
Form 35.2
Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

57.0 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

55.6 vs 65.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 50%
Brann logo Brann
W
Fredrikstad (39%)
W
Tromsø (68%)
D
Rosenborg (46%)
L
Viking (70%)
L
Sandefjord (50%)
W
HamKam (55%)
L
Tromsø (63%)
L
Kristiansund (48%)
NEC logo NEC
L
Groningen (66%)
D
Telstar (64%)
D
Twente (81%)
D
Feyenoord (67%)
W
Excelsior (60%)
D
Heerenveen (67%)
W
PSV (80%)
W
Volendam (49%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fredrikstad H
3 - 1 W
39%
Tromsø A
5 - 0 W
68%
Rosenborg A
1 - 1 D
46%
Viking A
2 - 3 L
70%
Sandefjord H
0 - 1 L
50%
HamKam A
5 - 1 W
55%
Tromsø H
1 - 2 L
63%
Kristiansund A
2 - 3 L
48%
Bologna A
0 - 1 L
61%
Bologna H
0 - 1 L
56%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Groningen A
1 - 2 L
66%
Telstar H
1 - 1 D
64%
Twente A
1 - 1 D
81%
Feyenoord H
1 - 1 D
67%
Excelsior A
2 - 0 W
60%
Heerenveen H
2 - 2 D
67%
PSV A
3 - 2 W
80%
Volendam H
3 - 0 W
49%
Fortuna H
2 - 3 L
56%
Ajax A
1 - 1 D
67%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

NEC has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 67.5) compared to Brann (SoS: 42.3). This means NEC's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Brann averaging 1.9 and NEC averaging 1.7 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Brann conceding 1.4 and NEC conceding 1.3 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

NEC has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.5 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Brann

Brann

VS
NEC

NEC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more