Heidenheim vs Napredak Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Heidenheim vs Napredak: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Heidenheim
Home Team
Napredak
Away Team
Compare...
Categories Won
Heidenheim
Draw
Napredak
Performance Radar
Statistical Comparison
3W, 3D, 4L
1W, 1D, 8L
19 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
19 / 10 matches
24 / 10 matches
0
-16
1 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
2W / 4 matches
0W / 4 matches
1W / 6 matches
1W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 91.0, Opponent Quality: 65.4
League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 55.5
0W / 2 matches
0W / 1 matches
Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.71
Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.02
Attack: 69.2, Defense: 40.1, Form: 32.8
Attack: 24.4, Defense: 18.3, Form: 9.1
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Heidenheim
Napredak
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.
Heidenheim has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 59.3) compared to Napredak (SoS: 41.4). This means Heidenheim's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.
Heidenheim's attack is on another level, averaging 1.9 goals per match with B. Zivzivadze leading the charge with 5 goals. Napredak manages just 0.8 per match.
Heidenheim has the defensive edge, conceding 1.9 per match compared to Napredak's 2.4.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.5 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.
Heidenheim emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (48.6 vs 25.8) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Heidenheim
Napredak
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Popular Teams